The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Evolution of Helping. I. An Ecological Constraints Model
Abstract
The ecological factors underlying the evolution of helping behavior in birds and mammals are examined. I argue that a necessary first step for the evolution of cooperative breeding is a substructuring of the population into small, stable, social units; in most known cases these are extended-family units. The ecological conditions leading to the development of such units are explored, and a general model is presented that emphasizes ecological constraints that limit the possibility of personal, independent breeding. When severe constraints occur, selection will favor delayed dispersal and continued retention of grown offspring within their natal units. Differing proximate factors can be responsible for limiting the option of personal reproduction. In stable, predictable environments where marginal habitat is scarce, high population density and resulting habitat saturation can lead to a severe shortage of territory openings (Brown 1974; Koenig and Pitelka 1981). This decreases the chance for independent establishment by new breeders. In variable and unpredictable environments, erratic changes in the carrying capacity can create the functional equivalents of breeding openings and closures. During harsh years, the cost of successfully reproducing can be magnified to prohibitive levels. When the chance of successful reproduction is sufficiently restricted, for either reason, selection will favor individuals remaining as nonbreeders within their natal groups. In essence, grown offspring remain at home only when the cost of doing otherwise is prohibitive. This ecological constraints model predicts that the frequency of occurrence of nonbreeders will vary directly with (1) the degree of difficulty in becoming established as a breeder (for species in stable, saturated, habitats), and (2) the level of environmental harshness (for species in erratic, unpredictable habitats). Available evidence is presented for the acorn woodpecker, Melanerpes formicivorus (representing 1), and the white-fronted bee-eater, Merops bullockoides (representing 2), in a preliminary test of the predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
First gene on the avian W chromosome (CHD) provides a tag for universal sexing of non-ratite birds
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0239 · Cited by 499
Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding
Hatchwell, B. J., & Komdeur, J. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1394 · Cited by 494
Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: Their costs and benefits
Taborsky, M. (1984) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(84)80241-9 · Cited by 369
Social organization of the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster)
Getz, L. L., McGuire, B., Pizzuto, T., Hofmann, J. E., & Frase, B. (1993) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1381904 · Cited by 350
Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: comparative evidence
Betzig, L. (2012) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.008 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Emlen, S. T.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-39
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2040543337
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of Helping. I. An Ecological Constraints Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283888
- The paper
- Emlen, S. T. (1982). The Evolution of Helping. I. An Ecological Constraints Model. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.