Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 671

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cryptic Female Choice and Its Implications in the Scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps

Thornhill, Randy·1983·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Female choice is a poorly understood area of evolutionary biology. Mate choice theory and the generally greater control of the process of reproduction by females than by males imply that female choice is prevalent in organisms and that it may be subtle in its nature, occurring even after mating and at any time until the female's control of gametes or zygotes terminates. Female choice in the Australian scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps, a species in which males provide females with a nuptial arthropod gift during mating, was studied in the field and laboratory. Female choice before mating occurs in H. nigriceps and there is considerable evidence of its occurrence during and after mating in this species. Females apparently choose during mating by controlling mating duration and thus the number of sperm received from different mates. Postmating choice in H. nigriceps appears to include a female's ability to regulate egg laying in relation to characteristics of her mate. Female choice during and after mating in H. nigriceps almost certainly leads to stronger sexual selection on males than premating choice. All forms of female choice in H. nigriceps would result in directional selection of the criteria important in choice (male body size and its correlate, ability to obtain large prey). Female choice on the basis of body size in H. nigriceps may enhance female fitness if body size is heritable: Large individuals obtain more matings (males) and are more fecund (females) than small individuals, and, in general, survival and size are positively related in both sexes. Fluctuating natural selection pressures on body size within generations may generate enough genetic variation in male body size to maintain adaptive female choice in H. nigriceps.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284170

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 671

Metadata

Authors
Thornhill, R.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1983-12
Volume
122
Issue
6
Pages
765-788
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W1968386022
Cited by
671
References
2
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cryptic Female Choice and Its Implications in the Scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284170
The paper
Thornhill, R. (1983). Cryptic Female Choice and Its Implications in the Scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284170

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.