The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Genetics and Morphological Evolution in Plants
Abstract
The genetic basis of differences in morphology within and between flowering plant species is reviewed in order to elucidate how many genetic changes are responsible for the evolution of new characters. Two broad morphological categories are evident. Differences in structure, shape, orientation, and presence versus absence are frequently discrete and appear to be governed by one or two genes. Differences in dimensions, weight, and number usually exhibit continuous variation and are influenced by numerous genes, though many of them probably act only indirectly via general effects at the whole organ or whole plant levels. Although it is difficult to specify the relative contributions of the two morphological categories during evolutionary divergence, it is clear that discrete character differences are more common in plants than in animals. I propose that their prevalence in plants is a direct consequence of the open, less integrative, and plastic patterns of plant morphogenesis which permit large changes in morphology on the basis of relatively few genetic changes. Morphological divergence among genera or families of flowering plants may reflect many fewer genetic changes than is the case for similar taxonomic levels of higher animals. Accurate estimates of the number of genes responsible for character divergence require knowledge of the ontogenetic and anatomical details of character development and these must be coordinated with genetic analyses. Until this knowledge becomes available, general conclusions about the number of genetic changes responsible for morphological diversity are premature.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“early botanical work found cases where speciation seemed to be driven by changes at a small number of loci (Hilu, 1983; Gottlieb, 1984; Bradshaw et al., 1995)”
From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Gottlieb, 1984
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 101 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottlieb, L. D.
- Corresponding author
- Gottlieb, L. D.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1984-05
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 681-709
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2020524544
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 22.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- morphological divergence, morphogenesis, developmental plasticity, flowering plants, character development, evolutionary divergence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetics and Morphological Evolution in Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284231
- The paper
- Gottlieb, L. D. (1984). Genetics and Morphological Evolution in Plants. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284231