Plankton Community Structure and Limnetic Primary Production
Open accessAbstract
A mechanistic, size-structured model was used to analyze effects of grazers on lacustrine primary productivity. Dependence of grazing and nutrient excretion rates on herbivore size, and dependence of algal metabolic rates on cell size, interacted to produce strong responses in primary productivity. Productivity was maximum at intermediate concentrations of chlorophyll and zooplankton biomass. This unimodal response is consistent with data from aquatic systems, terrestrial systems (where the underlying mechanisms are different), and theoretical expectations. Substantial variability in lake productivity (2 to 3 orders of magnitude) exists that cannot be explained by nutrient supply. Food web interactions can regulate herbivorous zooplankton size and abundance, independent of nutrient supply. The resultant variability in herbivory influences nutrient recycling and the size distribution of the phytoplankton, and can alter lake primary productivity by as much as two orders of magnitude.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Phytoplankton biomass depends both on nutrient availability and grazing pressure from large-bodied zooplankton like Daphnia.
“Phytoplankton biomass depends both on nutrient availability and grazing pressure from large bodied zooplankton like Daphnia (Brooks and Dodson 1965, Carpenter and Kitchell 1984, Lampert et al. 1986, McQueen et al. 1986).”
From Food web effects and the disappearance of the spring clear water phase in Onondaga Lake following nutrient loading reductions (2010) · cites this paper as Carpenter and Kitchell 1984
Cites
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thermodynamic Foundations of the Earth System
Kleidon, A. (2016) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139342742 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The propagation of disturbance in savannas through food webs
McNaughton, S. J. (1992) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3235755 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Wang, R. W., Rudstam, L. G., Brooking, T. E., Snyder, D. J., Arrigo, M. A., & Mills, E. L. (2010) · Lake and Reservoir Management · doi:10.1080/07438141.2010.504070 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carpenter, S. R., & Kitchell, J. F.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1984-08
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-172
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2016286022
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- plankton community structure, zooplankton grazing, nutrient excretion, phytoplankton size distribution, food web interactions, chlorophyll content, zooplankton biomass, nutrient cycling, size-structured models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review