The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spacing Dynamics of a Tropical Rain Forest Tree: Evaluation of the Janzen-Connell Model
Abstract
As a partial explanation for the maintenance of high tree diversity in wet tropical forests, Janzen (1970) and Connell (1971) independently hypothesized that natural enemies act to increase spacing within these tree populations through disproportionately high attack on progeny near adults. Both authors also hypothesized a minimum critical distance effect, because of 100% progeny mortality within a given distance of adults. We describe the necessary and sufficient conditions for testing these hypotheses, and show that attempts to evaluate them have been hampered by use of the inappropriate standard of regular spacing. Data describing the spacing dynamics of Dipteryx panamensis, a rain forest canopy tree, support both hypotheses. From 7 mo to 2 yr postgermination, seedling survival was positively correlated with distance to adult and negatively correlated with local conspecific seedling density. Partial correlation was used to separate the effects of density and distance, and it was shown that seedling density was the only significant factor in this case. Older juveniles and saplings occurred at greater distances from the nearest conspecific adult than did 1980 seedlings. No seedlings or juveniles survived within 8 m of an adult bole. A review of 24 data sets on tropical woody plants showed that most evidence indicates either density-dependence or distance-dependence in progeny mortality, as hypothesized by Janzen and Connell. Some positive evidence also exists for the minimum critical distance effect for tropical trees. In most of the cases involving seedling mortality, however, alternative causal factors such as intracohort competition or allelopathy were not ruled out. Before generalizations can be made about this process in tropical forests, carefully designed studies are needed on more populations of tropical trees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploring the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities: An Example for Rain Forest Trees
Webb, C. O. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303378 · Cited by 1,621
Menge, B. A., & Sutherland, J. P. (1987) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284741 · Cited by 1,587
A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity
Ricklefs, R. E. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00554.x · Cited by 1,360
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-2197 · Cited by 1,111
Why are there so many species in the tropics?
Brown, J. H. (2014) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12228 · Cited by 914
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, D. A., & Clark, D. B.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1984-12
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 769-788
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1969392946
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spacing Dynamics of a Tropical Rain Forest Tree: Evaluation of the Janzen-Connell Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284316
- The paper
- Clark, D. A., & Clark, D. B. (1984). Spacing Dynamics of a Tropical Rain Forest Tree: Evaluation of the Janzen-Connell Model. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.