The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Intrusion of Clonal Growth Patterns on Plant Breeding Systems
Abstract
As clonal plants get larger, individual flowers become more surrounded by other flowers borne on the same clone. With very restricted movement of pollen reported for both animal- and wind-pollinated species, the breeding system may change as a consequence of a clonal plant covering greater amounts of space. In Carex platyphylla, a wind-pollinated, self-compatible sedge, the absolute and relative amount of endogenous pollen per flowering culm increases sharply as a plant grows from one to about 10 culms, then increases at a slower rate, given a constant rain of exogenous pollen. In Trifolium repens, a bee-pollinated, self-incompatible, stoloniferous clover, a model based on known patterns of flower placement and stolon growth patterns, coupled with estimates of pollen-deposition and floret-visitation patterns by bees, suggests that the number and length of stolon internodes affect successful pollination. Also, the distribution of seeds among inflorescences is affected by clonal growth patterns and bee behavior at each floret. The dynamics of internode initiation and growth also change the rate of interdigitation of clones, which will subsequently affect the pollination ecology. An additional, field test with the viny herb Cucumis sativus demonstrated that as plants increase in size and in number of flowers, the pollinator pool, the success of flowers in setting seed, and gene flow distance all change. Shifts in breeding systems as a function of plant growth and flower placement may be widespread among clonal and nonclonal plants. This relationship is very sensitive to short distance dispersal of pollen, the behavior and diversity of pollinators, and the community structure around the population. Internal controls on fruit set within the clone and evolutionary responses of the plant (altered phenology, genetic changes in the breeding system) may interact with the geometry of clonal spread in determining gene flow patterns. Change in mating patterns may be common, and species and populations cannot be characterized without consideration of their current population structure and ecology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological and Genetic Consequences of Density-Dependent Regulation in Plants
Antonovics, J., & Levin, D. A. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.002211 · Cited by 492
Cited by
Pollination Ecology, Plant Population Structure, and Gene Flow
HANDEL, S. N. (1983) · Pollination Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-583980-8.50015-6 · Cited by 282
Self-citationThompson, J. D. (2001) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420000531 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Handel, S. N.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1985-03
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-384
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2029608949
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Intrusion of Clonal Growth Patterns on Plant Breeding Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284348
- The paper
- Handel, S. N. (1985). The Intrusion of Clonal Growth Patterns on Plant Breeding Systems. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.