Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,350

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Nutritional Explanation for Body-Size Patterns of Ruminant and Nonruminant Herbivores

Demment, Montague W., Van Soest, Peter J.·1985·The American Naturalist

Abstract

The gut capacity of mammalian herbivores increases linearly with body weight. This relationship, coupled with the change in basal metabolism with weight, produces an MR/GC ratio (metabolic requirement/gut capacity) that decreases with increasing body size. Since the retention of a food particle within the gut is proportional to this ratio, the extent to which food particles are digested will be related to body size. Plant material is made up of chemical components that react differently to digestive enzymes. The fiber fraction of plant material (i.e., cell wall) is digested slowly and exclusively by microbial symbiotes. A positive relationship probably exists between the fiber content of plant parts and their biomass in the environment. This relationship is used to describe a resource axis on which digestion rate is the scaling variable. In response to this resource axis and metabolic requirements, the fiber content of the diet of herbivores increases with body size. Ruminants are the predominant medium-sized herbivores in East Africa, while nonruminants are mainly small or very large animals. Small herbivores are constrained to rapid passage of ingesta by their high MR/GC ratio. In response, they have evolved hindgut fermentation and feed selectively on rapidly digestible (i.e., low-fiber) foods. Both responses contribute to loss of nutrients (synthesized by gut microbes) in the feces, and thus contribute to coprophagy in this group. To eat a diet higher in fiber, the herbivore must increase its body size. The reduced MR/GC ratio of medium-sized herbivores allows the evolution of gut structures that selectively delay the passage of ingesta. Selective delay results from the rumination process because the probability of passage is tied to particle size. This process produces more efficient fiber digestion in ruminants than that in nonruminants of similar size. Rumination, however, is advantageous over only a limited range of body sizes. The lower limits of ruminant body size are set by maximal fermentation rates. Foregut fermentation will not only digest the cell wall, but also use many of the soluble nutrients before their direct absorption is possible. Therefore, ruminants must rely almost entirely on the production of microbial volatile fatty acids (VFA) for energy and postruminal digestion of microbes for other nutrients. With decreasing body size, the increasing rate at which energy must be produced per unit volume of the rumen cannot be matched by a concomitant increase in the fermentation rate of forages. Nonruminants are favored by the more efficient energy transfer of enzymatic digestion in the foregut of the low-fiber foods often required by small animals. The upper limits may be imposed by two factors. First, rumination rates (g cell wall ruminated per unit time) increase with body size more slowly than does the cell-wall content of the diet. Using the case of the African buffalo, we arrived at calculations which suggest that sufficient intake of a high-fiber diet cannot be maintained to provide the energy necessary to support larger body sizes. Second, with increased body size the very low MR/GC ratio allows very long retention times. A point in body size is reached (600-1200 kg) at which retention times are sufficient to achieve relatively complete digestion of the potentially digestible component of forages, regardless of whether the herbivore possesses a selective delay mechanism of the rumen or the "perfect mixing" of the nonruminant model. Because of the small body size of early ruminants, the evolution of the rumen was probably initiated by selection for the detoxification or synthetic capabilities of foregut fermentation. The foregut then was preadapted for development as a structure for the selective delay of forages when the grasslands expanded. Changing body size is postulated as a mechanism for differentiating the feeding requirements of herbivores. The fiber composition of plant material is the scaling variable for a resource axis for herbivores. Large herbivores can extract more energy from plant material than can smaller herbivores, but cannot concentrate on the rapidly digestible foods used by small animals because these foods are rare. Therefore, if competition is important in structuring herbivore communities, then body size is probably a factor that contributes to feeding differences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284369

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,350

Metadata

Authors
Demment, M. W., & Van Soest, P. J.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1985-05
Volume
125
Issue
5
Pages
641-672
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2005524388
Cited by
1,350
References
1
FWCI
23.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Nutritional Explanation for Body-Size Patterns of Ruminant and Nonruminant Herbivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284369
The paper
Demment, M. W., & Van Soest, P. J. (1985). A Nutritional Explanation for Body-Size Patterns of Ruminant and Nonruminant Herbivores. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284369

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.