Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,050

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Resource-Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession

Tilman, David·1985·The American Naturalist

Abstract

The resource-ratio hypothesis assumes that each plant species is a superior competitor for a particular proportion of the limiting resources and predicts that community composition should change whenever the relative availability of two or more limiting resources changes. It is suggested that (1) the major limiting resources for mesic terrestrial habitats are often a soil resource, especially nitrogen, and light; (2) these resources are naturally inversely related, the habitats with poor soils having high-light availability and the habitats with rich soils having low-light availability; (3) the life history of a plant should depend on the point along the soil-resource: light gradient at which the plant is a superior competitor; and (4) primary succession and secondary succession on poor soils result from a temporal gradient in the relative availabilities of a limiting soil resource and light. If, as hypothesized, plants specialized on low-nutrient habitats are relatively short in height, short-lived, and fast growing, and if they reproduce early in life compared to plants dominant when light at the soil surface is limiting, these life history differences could explain the similarity of secondary succession on rich soils to primary succession and secondary succession on poor soils.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284382

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Cited by

See all 1,050

Metadata

Authors
Tilman, D.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1985-06
Volume
125
Issue
6
Pages
827-852
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2037101672
Cited by
1,050
References
55
FWCI
16.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Resource-Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284382
The paper
Tilman, D. (1985). The Resource-Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284382

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.