Cited by 140Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyAerospace and Aviation Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution of Vertebrate Flight: An Aerodynamic Model for the Transition from Gliding to Active Flight

Norberg, Ulla M.·1985·The American Naturalist

Abstract

I counter recent criticism against the arboreal theory of the evolution of flight in vertebrates. It has been stated, for instance, that incipient flapping during gliding would dramatically reduce lift, and that the generation of vortex rings by wing strokes must be a principal problem for animals to solve in evolving powered flight. The criticism is mostly unfounded and lacks adequate explanations. My model, based on quasi-stationary aerodynamics, shows that sufficient lift and a net thrust can be produced even during very slight flapping in a gliding animal. The model is constructed so that the various flight variables always combine in such a way that the vertical lift force produced during one complete wing stroke in partially powered flight by a hypothetical animal always equals the weight of the animal. Given this constraint, the model then explores whether there is any net horizontal thrust beyond that needed to balance body drag. The outcome is that, given certain flight variables, a net thrust will always be generated during partially powered flight. Any such thrust can be used to make the flight path shallower than it is in equilibrium gliding for the same animal. This strongly supports the arboreal theory of the evolution of flight in birds, bats, and pterosaurs, which includes a gliding stage before powered flight originated. The transition between gliding and flapping also can be easily explained by the vortex theory. As it travels, a gliding animal leaves a continuous vortex sheet which rolls up into a pair of vortex tubes. Slight flapping might create undulating vortex tubes of essentially the same character. During more powerful flapping and with the upstroke being a recovery stroke, or with the air meeting the dorsal side of the wings on the upstroke, providing thrust and negative lift, the vortex tubes become interrupted and roll up into vortex rings. My aerodynamic model applies to the transition from gliding to powered flight, regardless of the evolutionary path of the gliding behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284419

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The utility of gliding or flap-descent provides a logical selective pressure that could generate several parallel experiments with aerial behavior, only one of which led directly to avian flight.

    “From there the utility of gliding or flap-descent (Norberg, 1985; Rayner, 1988) provides a logical selective pressure that could generate several parallel experiments with aerial behavior, only one of which led directly to avian flight.”
  • The trees-down hypothesis is predicated on the existence of a lineage of highly arboreal theropods preceding the evolution of the aerofoil and gliding locomotion.

    “The trees-down hypothesis is predicated on the existence a lineage of highly arboreal theropods preceding the evolution of the aerofoil and gliding locomotion [8], [12], [14], [24].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Norberg, U. M.
Corresponding author
Norberg, Ulla M.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1985-09
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
303-327
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2067054145
Cited by
140
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
Keywords
flight evolution, gliding, flapping flight, powered flight, lift force, net thrust, vortex rings, vortex theory, birds, bats, pterosaurs, flight path angle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review