The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of Vertebrate Flight: An Aerodynamic Model for the Transition from Gliding to Active Flight
Abstract
I counter recent criticism against the arboreal theory of the evolution of flight in vertebrates. It has been stated, for instance, that incipient flapping during gliding would dramatically reduce lift, and that the generation of vortex rings by wing strokes must be a principal problem for animals to solve in evolving powered flight. The criticism is mostly unfounded and lacks adequate explanations. My model, based on quasi-stationary aerodynamics, shows that sufficient lift and a net thrust can be produced even during very slight flapping in a gliding animal. The model is constructed so that the various flight variables always combine in such a way that the vertical lift force produced during one complete wing stroke in partially powered flight by a hypothetical animal always equals the weight of the animal. Given this constraint, the model then explores whether there is any net horizontal thrust beyond that needed to balance body drag. The outcome is that, given certain flight variables, a net thrust will always be generated during partially powered flight. Any such thrust can be used to make the flight path shallower than it is in equilibrium gliding for the same animal. This strongly supports the arboreal theory of the evolution of flight in birds, bats, and pterosaurs, which includes a gliding stage before powered flight originated. The transition between gliding and flapping also can be easily explained by the vortex theory. As it travels, a gliding animal leaves a continuous vortex sheet which rolls up into a pair of vortex tubes. Slight flapping might create undulating vortex tubes of essentially the same character. During more powerful flapping and with the upstroke being a recovery stroke, or with the air meeting the dorsal side of the wings on the upstroke, providing thrust and negative lift, the vortex tubes become interrupted and roll up into vortex rings. My aerodynamic model applies to the transition from gliding to powered flight, regardless of the evolutionary path of the gliding behavior.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The utility of gliding or flap-descent provides a logical selective pressure that could generate several parallel experiments with aerial behavior, only one of which led directly to avian flight.
“From there the utility of gliding or flap-descent (Norberg, 1985; Rayner, 1988) provides a logical selective pressure that could generate several parallel experiments with aerial behavior, only one of which led directly to avian flight.”
From A new paravian dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of North America supports a late acquisition of avian flight (2019) · cites this paper as Norberg, 1985
The trees-down hypothesis is predicated on the existence of a lineage of highly arboreal theropods preceding the evolution of the aerofoil and gliding locomotion.
“The trees-down hypothesis is predicated on the existence a lineage of highly arboreal theropods preceding the evolution of the aerofoil and gliding locomotion [8], [12], [14], [24].”
From Assessing Arboreal Adaptations of Bird Antecedents: Testing the Ecological Setting of the Origin of the Avian Flight Stroke (2011) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Feathers of Archaeopteryx : Asymmetric Vanes Indicate Aerodynamic Function
Feduccia, A., & Tordoff, H. B. (1979) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.203.4384.1021 · Cited by 111
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Four-winged dinosaurs from China
Xu, X., Zhou, Z., Wang, X., Kuang, X., Zhang, F., & Du, X. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01342 · Cited by 485
Gliding and the Functional Origins of Flight: Biomechanical Novelty or Necessity?
Dudley, R., Byrnes, G., Yanoviak, S. P., Borrell, B., Brown, R. M., & McGuire, J. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110014 · Cited by 192
Narrow Primary Feather Rachises in Confuciusornis and Archaeopteryx Suggest Poor Flight Ability
Nudds, R. L., & Dyke, G. J. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188895 · Cited by 95
Hartman, S., Mortimer, M., Wahl, W. R., Lomax, D. R., Lippincott, J., & Lovelace, D. M. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.7247 · Cited by 86
Alexander, D. E., Gong, E., Martin, L. D., Burnham, D. A., & Falk, A. R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0911852107 · Cited by 78
Dececchi, T. A., & Larsson, H. C. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022292 · Cited by 56
“The trees-down hypothesis is predicated on the existence a lineage of highly arboreal theropods preceding the evolution of the aerofoil and gliding locomotion [8,12,14,24].”
BackgroundLees, J., Garner, T., Cooper, G., & Nudds, R. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160927 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Norberg, U. M.
- Corresponding author
- Norberg, Ulla M.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-327
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2067054145
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
- Keywords
- flight evolution, gliding, flapping flight, powered flight, lift force, net thrust, vortex rings, vortex theory, birds, bats, pterosaurs, flight path angle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review