The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Diffuse Competition Along an Environmental Gradient: Results from a Shoreline Plant Community
Abstract
We propose a method for measuring variation in diffuse competition along an environmental gradient. This approach has two advantages over pairwise-competition experiments conducted in homogeneous environments. First, it may be more realistic, since individuals in nature are usually confronted with a variety of neighbors, that is, with diffuse competition. Second, this approach allows us to test whether the variation in diffuse competition is correlated with gradients in environmental factors. We used a field experiment to test whether diffuse competition is correlated with standing crop and organic-matter content in the soil of a lakeshore plant community. Diffuse competition was correlated significantly and positively with both of these factors. Further, standing crop was correlated positively with organic-matter content in the soil, suggesting that a general measure of habitat productivity may be indirectly related to the intensity of diffuse competition. These results support models of species diversity and adaptive strategies that assume a predictable variation in the importance of competition within a community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Exclusion in Herbaceous Vegetation
GRIME, J. P. (1973) · Nature · doi:10.1038/242344a0 · Cited by 2,507
Cited by
Goldberg, D. E., & Barton, A. M. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285357 · Cited by 747
Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups
Poorter, H., & Navas, M. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00680.x · Cited by 600
Goldberg, D. E., Rajaniemi, T., Gurevitch, J., & Stewart-Oaten, A. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1118:eatqii]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 485
Plant Competition and Resource Availability in Response to Disturbance and Fertilization
Wilson, S. D., & Tilman, D. (1993) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939319 · Cited by 472
Self-citationCOMPETITION AND SALT-MARSH PLANT ZONATION: STRESS TOLERATORS MAY BE DOMINANT COMPETITORS
Emery, N. C., Ewanchuk, P. J., & Bertness, M. D. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2471:casmpz]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, S. D., & Keddy, P. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1986-06
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 862-869
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2050606254
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.