The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcompensation in Response to Mammalian Herbivory: The Advantage of Being Eaten
Abstract
Plants of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata, are exposed to high levels of mammalian herbivory (by mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus, and elk, Cervus elaphus) early in the season, before flowering. During this period of our study, up to 56% of all individuals experienced a 95% reduction in aboveground biomass. Browsed plants rapidly responded by producing new inflorescences and flowering within 3 wk. Unbrowsed plants produced only single inflorescences, whereas browsed plants produced multiple inflorescences. Field observations and experimental manipulations showed that plants with multiple inflorescences produced significantly greater numbers of flowers and fruits than unbrowsed individuals. Because there were no differences between browsed and unbrowsed individuals in the number of seeds produced per fruit, seed weight, subsequent germination success, and survival, browsed plants enjoyed a 2.4-fold increase in relative fitness. Consequently, there is an immediate reproductive advantage to being eaten. Under the natural field conditions of this study, mammalian herbivores played a beneficial role in the survival and reproductive success of scarlet gilia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production
Mattson, W. J., & Addy, N. D. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.190.4214.515 · Cited by 573
Cited by
Modification of Ecosystems by Ungulates
Hobbs, N. T. (1996) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802368 · Cited by 1,016
EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF PATHOGEN RESISTANCE AND TOLERANCE
Roy, B. A., & Kirchner, J. W. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00007.x · Cited by 587
Seastedt, T. R., & Knapp, A. K. (1993) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285494 · Cited by 199
A Latex Metabolite Benefits Plant Fitness under Root Herbivore Attack
Huber, M., Epping, J., Schulze Gronover, C., Fricke, J., Aziz, Z., Brillatz, T., Swyers, M., Köllner, T. G., Vogel, H., Hammerbacher, A., et al. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002332 · Cited by 97
Bretherton, S., Tordoff, G. M., Jones, T. H., & Boddy, L. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00149.x · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Paige, K. N., & Whitham, T. G.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-416
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2054585586
- Cited by
- 650
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcompensation in Response to Mammalian Herbivory: The Advantage of Being Eaten. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284645
- The paper
- Paige, K. N., & Whitham, T. G. (1987). Overcompensation in Response to Mammalian Herbivory: The Advantage of Being Eaten. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284645
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.