The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination
Abstract
Sexual selection depends on differential patterns of mate preference and choice. Little attention has been paid, however, to the manner in which individuals acquire information about the quality of potential mates and how this information is used to form mating decisions. Different decision rules for determining mating preferences often lead to different fitness consequences for the actively searching and choosy sex. In this paper, I compare the expected fitness consequences of two alternative decision-making strategies: a best-of-n strategy (whereby searching individuals choose the best mate from a sample of size n) and a strategy based on sequential sampling (whereby the searching individual establishes a critical mate quality and continues searching until encountering a mate at or above this quality). For the same distribution of potential mate qualities, the sequential-search strategy generates higher expected fitness gains than the best-of-n strategy. This is in contrast to earlier conclusions (e.g., Janetos 1980; Halliday 1983) that the best-of-n is a dominant strategy for mate choice. In the models presented here, the cost of mate search is included; earlier models neglected this important aspect of mate choice, and this difference accounts for the different conclusions. The sequential-search model establishes a critical mate-acceptance level that equates the cost of sampling one additional potential mate and the expected fitness gain from one additional search. As the cost of search increases, the critical threshold decreases. The basic sequential-search model can be extended to include time discounting, finite time horizon, systematic search, learning, variable search costs, and mate responsiveness. In each extension, new critical thresholds for mate acceptability can be established. In some cases, such as an extension to include a finite time horizon, the critical threshold is anticipated to undergo a monotonic decline as search progresses: searchers become less choosy over time if they are unsuccessful at finding mates. The role of the arithmetic mean and variance of fitness among potential mates can be explored within these simple models. As the mean and variance of mate quality within the population increases, the critical threshold for acceptability increases. The basic model and its extensions are subject to easy empirical testing. These models will prove valuable in establishing the link between aspects of individual behavior and population-level selection processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Introduction to Statistical Analysis.
Latshaw, V. V., Dixon, W. J., & Massey, F. J. (1957) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2309989 · Cited by 5,072
Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach
Adams, J., Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (1992) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5530 · Cited by 3,899
Increasing risk: I. A definition
Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(70)90038-4 · Cited by 3,829
Optimal Foraging: A Selective Review of Theory and Tests
Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., & Charnov, E. L. (1977) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409852 · Cited by 3,373
Stigler, G. J. (1976) · Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_86 · Cited by 3,287
Introduction to Mathematical Statistics.
AA, Hogg, R. V., & Craig, A. T. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291439 · Cited by 2,888
Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects
(1979) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-108750-0.x5001-0 · Cited by 1,692
ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY
Arnold, S. J., & Wade, M. J. (1984) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00344.x · Cited by 1,265
Economics of Information and Job Search
McCall, J. J. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879403 · Cited by 1,240
Cited by
VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
JENNIONS, M. D., & PETRIE, M. (1997) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1997.tb00015.x · Cited by 459
Female choice in sage grouse: the roles of attraction and active comparison
Gibson, R. M. (1996) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s002650050266 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Real, L.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376-405
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2051619770
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 15.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285103
- The paper
- Real, L. (1990). Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.