The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Testing Parental Investment and the Control of Sexual Selection in Katydids: The Operational Sex Ratio
Abstract
Theory predicts that relative parental investment by the sexes controls the ratio of the numbers of fertilizable females and sexually active males (the operational sex ratio, OSR) and thus sexual selection and sexual differences. This paper tests the hypothesis that variation in parental investment controls the numbers of males and females available for mating. In katydids, males and females invest parentally by providing material investment to eggs, with the male donation derived from spermatophore materials eaten by the female. Previous work with katydids in nature has shown intraspecific variation in sexual selection acting on females; only certain populations show a courtship role reversal in which females compete for access to males. These observations led to the hypothesis that the availability of food in nature determines the frequency of spermatophore production and thus the number of males available for mating. In the present study, male and female katydids were maintained on diets that differed in food quality. Both sexes were given daily access to sexually receptive members of the opposite sex. As predicted, males on a low-quality diet mated less frequently than males on a high-quality diet. The opposite trend was observed for females: females on a low-quality diet increased mating frequency, apparently to obtain additional spermatophore nutrients. These data suggest that male parental investment in the spermatophore increases in its relative importance when diet is low in quality. The effects of diet on mating frequency result in different estimates of the OSR, which accord with observations in nature: for the high-quality diet, there are fewer fertilizable females than sexually active males; similar conditions in nature would be predicted to result in a male-to-male competitive (polygynous) mating system. For the low-quality diet, there were slightly fewer fertilizable females, indicating that such a diet may result in competition among females.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence
BONDURIANSKY, R. (2001) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793101005693 · Cited by 1,018
No�, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1994) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00167053 · Cited by 914
The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies
VAHED, K. (1998) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1997.tb00025.x · Cited by 645
Metadata
- Authors
- Gwynne, D. T.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 474-484
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2051290933
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing Parental Investment and the Control of Sexual Selection in Katydids: The Operational Sex Ratio. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285108
- The paper
- Gwynne, D. T. (1990). Testing Parental Investment and the Control of Sexual Selection in Katydids: The Operational Sex Ratio. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.