Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A General Model of the Role of Male-Donated Nutrients in Female Insects' Reproduction

Boggs, Carol L.·1990·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Male insects of many species donate nutrients to their females at mating, and the females can use these nutrients for egg production and somatic maintenance. These male-derived nutrients represent male investment in reproduction. The relative investment by each sex in reproduction has been postulated to be a determinant of the mating system and possible operation of sexual selection. However, the effect of male nutrient donations on female fitness is not well understood. I examine the effect on female fitness of male nutrients donated at mating in terms of the role of male nutrients in the female's nutrient budget for egg production. Nonnutritional constraints on total egg mass, the timing of egg production, the quality and quantity of adult female feeding, and alternative functions of male nutrient donations are incorporated into a model describing the role of male-derived nutrients. The model predicts the conditions under which changes in the availability of male-derived nutrients to individual females will be accompanied by changes in female fecundity, in adult female feeding, and/or in the allocation of the total nutrient pool to egg production. The model also can be used to predict the relative importance of male nutrient donations to female reproduction and hence the likelihood of sexual selection mediated by nutrient donations. Furthermore, the model can be used to predict associations of reproductive and foraging traits within a species or population. Data from the literature corroborate the assumption that male-derived nutrients may differ in composition from nutrients available to the female from adult feeding. Literature data also support the predictions that changes in male nutrient donation result in changes in female fecundity only when adult female feeding is restricted and that, given the opportunity, females on restricted adult diets ingest more nutrients from males. Data are not currently available to test other predictions of the model adequately. Finally, new data for two species of Lepidoptera with rich adult diets are presented that support the model's prediction that adult female feeding and the acquisition of male nutrients via mating should be inversely correlated when fecundity is constrained by nonnutritional factors. Thus, male-derived nutrients may affect female fitness through effects on foraging as well as on fecundity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/285118

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
Boggs, C. L.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1990-11
Volume
136
Issue
5
Pages
598-617
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W1966849505
Cited by
250
References
0
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A General Model of the Role of Male-Donated Nutrients in Female Insects' Reproduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285118
The paper
Boggs, C. L. (1990). A General Model of the Role of Male-Donated Nutrients in Female Insects' Reproduction. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285118

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.