The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Evolution of Fruit Color in Fleshy-Fruited Plants
Abstract
Red and black are the most common colors of bird-dispersed fruits in all regions of the world for which information is available; other colors occur, but at lower frequencies. We present 13 nonexclusive hypotheses that may contribute to the observed frequency distribution of fruit colors and assess them, in a preliminary way, using existing information. Five hypotheses relate fruit colors directly to avian foraging: (1) birds prefer red and black (weak support at best); (2) red and black displays are more readily discovered by foraging birds (mixed evidence); (3) fruit colors indicate fruit maturity (mixed evidence); (4) fruit colors facilitate quick recognition of food (little evidence); (5) nutritionally poor fruits mimic nutrient-rich fruits (no data). Three hypotheses relate fruit colors to defense against natural enemies: (6) red fruits are inconspicuous to fruit-foraging arthropods (limited applicability); (7) fruit colors exclude poor dispersal agents (few data); (8) fruit pigments defend fruits against parasites and pathogens (no data for present day fruits; may have been important in evolutionary time). In addition, fruit colors may be physiological adaptations (hypothesis 9; little evidence) or may have evolved by selection acting on correlated characters (hypothesis 10; few data). Finally, production of fruit pigments may be constrained by metabolic costs (hypothesis 11; few data), by competition for dispersal agents (hypothesis 12; no data), or by phylogenetic history (hypothesis 13; little support). We draw together a large body of information from various sources in our preliminary assessment of these hypotheses, but there is no substitute for direct experimentation and comparison.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution
Endler, J. A. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285308 · Cited by 1,960
Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision
Regan, B. C., Julliot, C., Simmen, B., Viénot, F., Charles–Dominique, P., & Mollon, J. D. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0773 · Cited by 578
Non-foliar photosynthesis – a strategy of additional carbon acquisition
Aschan, G., & Pfanz, H. (2003) · Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants · doi:10.1078/0367-2530-00080 · Cited by 368
How plant?animal interactions signal new insights in communication
SCHAEFER, H., SCHAEFER, V, & LEVEY, D. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.08.003 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Willson, M. F., & Whelan, C. J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 790-809
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2073394301
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of Fruit Color in Fleshy-Fruited Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285132
- The paper
- Willson, M. F., & Whelan, C. J. (1990). The Evolution of Fruit Color in Fleshy-Fruited Plants. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.