Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic Variation for Habitat Preference: Evidence and Explanations

Jaenike, John, Holt, Robert D.·1991·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Because adaptive shifts may often be initiated by evolutionary changes in behavior, it is of interest to determine the extent to which natural populations harbor genetic variation for ecologically important behaviors. Habitat preference is an especially significant behavior, because it determines the regime of natural selection acting on loci that affect adaptation to the environment. A survey of the literature reveals that genetic variation for habitat selection is common, especially in arthropods and mollusks, the groups that have been studied most frequently. Possible adaptive mechanisms by which this variation could be maintained within populations include a genetic correlation between density-independent fitness in a habitat and a preference for it; and soft selection, whereby density-dependent population regulation occurs independently in separate habitats. Several studies have documented a phenotypic correlation between preference and performance, but as yet, no such genetic correlations have been unequivocally demonstrated. We show theoretically that under hard selection, optimal habitat selection may often lower the probability of maintaining a polymorphism at a locus that affects adaptation to different habitats. Soft selection appears much more likely to promote variation for habitat preference. Mechanisms including resource competition and natural enemies whose numbers build up in a habitat-specific manner in response to host or prey density have the capacity to bring about selection favoring alleles whose carriers prefer relatively underused habitats. We believe that more progress in understanding the evolution of habitat preference will come from studies of these ecological mechanisms than from further demonstrations of the mere existence of genetic variation for such preferences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/285140

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Jaenike, J., & Holt, R. D.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1991-06
Volume
137
Pages
S67-S90
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2054741273
Cited by
322
References
1
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Variation for Habitat Preference: Evidence and Explanations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285140
The paper
Jaenike, J., & Holt, R. D. (1991). Genetic Variation for Habitat Preference: Evidence and Explanations. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.