The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic Variation for Habitat Preference: Evidence and Explanations
Abstract
Because adaptive shifts may often be initiated by evolutionary changes in behavior, it is of interest to determine the extent to which natural populations harbor genetic variation for ecologically important behaviors. Habitat preference is an especially significant behavior, because it determines the regime of natural selection acting on loci that affect adaptation to the environment. A survey of the literature reveals that genetic variation for habitat selection is common, especially in arthropods and mollusks, the groups that have been studied most frequently. Possible adaptive mechanisms by which this variation could be maintained within populations include a genetic correlation between density-independent fitness in a habitat and a preference for it; and soft selection, whereby density-dependent population regulation occurs independently in separate habitats. Several studies have documented a phenotypic correlation between preference and performance, but as yet, no such genetic correlations have been unequivocally demonstrated. We show theoretically that under hard selection, optimal habitat selection may often lower the probability of maintaining a polymorphism at a locus that affects adaptation to different habitats. Soft selection appears much more likely to promote variation for habitat preference. Mechanisms including resource competition and natural enemies whose numbers build up in a habitat-specific manner in response to host or prey density have the capacity to bring about selection favoring alleles whose carriers prefer relatively underused habitats. We believe that more progress in understanding the evolution of habitat preference will come from studies of these ecological mechanisms than from further demonstrations of the mere existence of genetic variation for such preferences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Cited by
Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles
Bush, G. L. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90031-0 · Cited by 478
Evolutionary Influence on Human Landscape Preference
Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (2010) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916509341244 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaenike, J., & Holt, R. D.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 137
- Pages
- S67-S90
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2054741273
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Variation for Habitat Preference: Evidence and Explanations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285140
- The paper
- Jaenike, J., & Holt, R. D. (1991). Genetic Variation for Habitat Preference: Evidence and Explanations. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.