The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community-Assembly Mechanics and the Structure of an Experimental Species Ensemble
Abstract
It was relatively easy to produce alternative community states as a function of variability in a sequence of species invasions employed to assemble a community. Numerous mechanisms and processes are capable of producing both temporary and nonrecoverable differences in community structure. They include priority effects, intransitivities, emergent properties (e.g., vulnerability to invasion, specific topologies), and effects specific to differences in assembly sequences themselves. In ecological systems, the existence of alternative states presents a difficult comparative problem in the search for unifying principles that might underlie community-level organization. This problem can be solved only if we understand the cause of alternative states and determine whether such states are persistent or transient. Otherwise, ecological communities appear so variable that general principles and mechanisms elude detection, even if they exert a powerful influence over the structure of the system. Mechanisms that are documented as controlling community organization and the population dynamics of component species are not necessarily the mechanisms responsible for observed patterns. Factors uncovered in any extant community may be responsible only for maintaining the status quo. The reason these factors (e.g., competition, predation, parasitism) are currently operating is often a direct function of community-assembly mechanics. Community-assembly processes and dynamics must be understood if we are to discern properly between maintenance and causal mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity
Carpenter, S. R., Kitchell, J. F., & Hodgson, J. R. (1985) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1309989 · Cited by 2,646
Food Webs: Linkage, Interaction Strength and Community Infrastructure
Paine, R. T. (1980) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4220 · Cited by 1,824
Cited by
Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability.
Naeem, S., & Li, S. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37348 · Cited by 1,438
Alternative stable states in ecology
Beisner, B., Haydon, D., & Cuddington, K. (2003) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0376:assie]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,385
RUIZ, G. M., CARLTON, J. T., GROSHOLZ, E. D., & HINES, A. H. (1997) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/37.6.621 · Cited by 1,081
An exclusive metabolic niche enables strain engraftment in the gut microbiota
Shepherd, E. S., DeLoache, W. C., Pruss, K. M., Whitaker, W. R., & Sonnenburg, J. L. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0092-4 · Cited by 367
Experimental evidence for alternative stable equilibria in a benthic pond food web
Chase, J. M. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00482.x · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Drake, J. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2106844219
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.