The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web Theory
Abstract
Food webs in the real world are much more complex than food-web literature would have us believe. This is illustrated by the web of the sand community in the Coachella Valley desert. The biota include 174 species of vascular plants, 138 species of vertebrates, more than 55 species of arachnids, and an unknown (but great) number of microorganisms, insects (2,000-3,000 estimated species), acari, and nematodes. Trophic relations are presented in a series of nested subwebs and delineations of the community. Complexity arises from the large number of interactive species, the frequency of omnivory, age structure, looping, the lack of compartmentalization, and the complexity of the arthropod and soil faunas. Web features found in the Coachella also characterize other communities and should produce equivalently complex webs. If anything, diversity and complexity in most nondesert habitats are greater than those in deserts. Patterns from the Coachella web are compared with theoretical predictions and "empirical generalizations" derived from catalogs of published webs. The Coachella web differs greatly: chains are longer, omnivory and loops are not rare, connectivity is greater (species interact with many more predators and prey), top predators are rare or nonexistent, and prey-topredator ratios are greater than 1.0. The evidence argues that actual community food webs are extraordinarily more complex than those webs cataloged by theorists. I argue that most cataloged webs are oversimplified caricatures of actual communities. That cataloged webs depict so few species, absurdly low ratios of predators on prey and prey eaten by predators, so few links, so little omnivory, a veritable absence of looping, and such a high proportion of top predators argues strongly that they poorly represent real biological communities. Consequently, the practice of abstracting empirical regularities from such catalogs yields an inaccurate and artifactual view of trophic interactions within communities. Contrary to strong assertions by many theorists, patterns from food webs of real communities generally do not support predictions arising from dynamic and graphic models of food-web structure.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First, most food webs have poor resolution of primary producers; plants in terrestrial systems and phytoplankton in aquatic ones are typically represented by a few nodes that are highly aggregated taxonomically.”
From Spatial Guilds in the Serengeti Food Web Revealed by a Bayesian Group Model (2011) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–845 of 845
Complexity Analysis of the Crystal River Food Web in Florida Based on Topological Structure
王, 少. (2023) · Statistics and Application · doi:10.12677/sa.2023.126155 · Cited by 1
Skvarla, M., Ochoa, R., Rodrigues, J., & Hutcheson, H. J. (2019) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17265-7 · Cited by 1
Crossing boundaries: Shigeru Nakano’s enduring legacy for ecology
Fausch, K. (2017) · Ecological research · doi:10.1007/s11284-017-1513-9 · Cited by 1
“This feedback whereby empirical research does not simply respond by testing ecological theory, but indeed directs its development, is exactly the boundary that Gary Polis (1991) had proposed needed to be crossed.”
BackgroundInsects and the Ecological Basis for Mathematical Modelling
Ferreira, C. P., & Godoy, W. A. C. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06877-0_1 · Cited by 2
Spud Web: Species Interactions and Biodiversity in Potatoes
Lynch, C., Crowder, D., Jabbour, R., & Snyder, W. E. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386895-4.00009-0 · Cited by 1
Evolution of the trophic niche and food web structure
Ingram, T. (2011) · doi:10.14288/1.0105131 · Cited by 1
“More detailed food web data later revealed that many species in fact are omnivores feeding at multiple trophic levels (Polis, 1991; Goldwasser and Roughgarden, 1993).”
BackgroundResultThe Interplay Between Landscape Structure and Biotic Interactions
Zarnetske, P., Baiser, B., Strecker, A. L., Record, S., Belmaker, J., & Tuanmu, M. (2017) · Current Landscape Ecology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40823-017-0021-5
Warburton, E. M. (2020) · International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife · doi:10.1016/j.ijppaw.2020.04.003
“For instance, high food web connectivity and complex arthropod faunas within deserts (Polis, 1991) make incorporating trophic transmission via invertebrate intermediates evolutionarily advantageous to parasites in arid regions.”
InfluentialGarcía, E. R., & Cano-Santana, Z. (2009) · ACTA ZOOLÓGICA MEXICANA (N S ) · doi:10.21829/azm.2009.252641
Klanjšček, T., Hackenberger, D. K., Đerđ, T., Geček, S., Klanjšček, J., Haberle, I., Terzić, I., Pečar-Ilić, J., Bavčević, L., & Hackenberger, B. K. (2026) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111864
Interaction matrices as unifying tools for navigating ecological complexity.
Terry, J., Tabi, A., García-Callejas, D., & Domínguez-García, V. (2026) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-026-03188-x
Large-scale solar parks reshape ground arthropod assembly in the Tengger desert
Wang, Y.-Z., Fang, J., He, Z.-B., Liu, J.-L., Zhou, X.-G., Liu, H., & Xiao, J.-H. (2026) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.149528
Global solvability and stability of a protective taxis model with reverse predation
Choi, W. (2026) · Applicable Analysis · doi:10.1080/00036811.2026.2738859
Who Eats Whom? A global food web derived from citizen science
Allf, B. C., Mallavarapu, A., Kikuchi, D., Vasudeva, N., & Dunn, R. R. (2026) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003988
“Indeed, even in relatively simple, well-studied systems, food webs are extraordinarily complex and constructing accurate, complete food webs is very challenging [11].”
Resolving bottom-up and top-down food-web structure and function for Everglades restoration
Flood, P. J., Strickland, B. A., Mock, A. J., Trexler, J., & Dorn, N. (2026) · Food Webs · doi:10.1016/j.fooweb.2026.e00475
Quality, then quantity: determinants of autochthony in freshwater food webs
Leal, J. S., González, A. L., de Souza, N. F., Sanches, L. F., & Farjalla, V. F. (2026) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-026-05934-1
“This shift in perspective from focusing solely on food quantity to considering food quality has led to a growing emphasis on how different types of resources contribute to energy transfer in freshwater ecosystems (Polis 1991; Nakano and Murakami 2001; Vadeboncoeur et al. 2002).”
Kabat, K. L., Bullock, J., Tucker, E., Ye, V., Angle, J. C., Jaffe, B. D., & Barnes, M. A. (2026) · Environmental DNA · doi:10.1002/edn3.70330
Dong, X.-T., Fu, X.-T., Jia, Y.-H., Chang, J., Huo, Z.-J., & Meng, R.-X. (2026) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.70759
“8,9 Thus, omnivores assume an important position in the study of food webs.”
Wang, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, Y.-Z., Ma, Q., Luo, Y.-Z., Luo, X., Zhou, X.-G., Li, F., & Liu, J.-L. (2026) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d18020103
“Arachnids and soil mesofauna are important predatory and litter decomposition components of the detrital food web in desert ecosystems [1,2,4].”
InfluentialBellingeri, M., Bevacqua, D., Cassi, D., Alfieri, R., Martinetti, D., & Bohan, D. A. (2026) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2025.2690
A microbiologist’s field guide to community ecology
Beldi, L., Henderson, A., Lee, M. N. Y., Luneau, J. S., Mazel, F., Miller, T. E., Padmanabha, P., Raach, B., van Vliet, S., Weiss, A. S., et al. (2026) · ISME Communications · doi:10.1093/ismeco/ycag118
“Some ecologists have even questioned the validity of discrete trophic levels altogether [56], suggesting that species’ positions within food webs are more continuous than categorical.”
A homoclinic route to chaos in omnivore communities
Niu, Y.-Y., Kang, J., Tao, W., & Wang, X. (2025) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ae4b18
“Omnivory through intraguild predation is pervasive in natural ecosystems and has been recognized as a key driver of complex population dynamics [9,29,36].”
Copycat cannibals: witnessing cannibalism early in life affects adult behaviour
Marcossi, Í., Fonseca, M. M., Souza, S. F. J., de Assis, C. B. D., Iasczczaki, R. S., Beghelli, G. M., Bittencourt, R., Pallini, A., Choh, Y., & Janssen, A. (2025) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-025-05748-7
“Small predators may be vulnerable to predation by large adult prey when small, but when large, later in life, become predators of these prey (Saito 1986; Polis et al. 1989; Polis 1991; Palomares and Caro 1999; Janssen et al. 2002; Magal-hães et al. 2005).”
Zararlılarla Mücadelede Birlik İçi Avcılığın Parazitoitler Üzerine Etkisi
Kandi̇l, C., & Tunca, H. (2023) · Journal of Institute of Science and Technology · doi:10.21597/jist.1245288
The ghost of ecology in chaos, combining intransitive and higher order effects
Vandermeer, J., & Perfecto, I. (2023) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.09239
“The importance of these higher order effects has been long appreciated (Vandermeer, 1969; Polis, 1991) and recently gained prominence theoretically (Bairey et al., 2016; Angulo et al., 2021), complementing a substantial number of empirical examples (Werner and Peacor, 2003; Hsieh and Perfecto,…”
BackgroundMathematical Analysis of Intraguild Interactions among Hosts, Parasitoids and Predators
You, H., & Cheng, K. (2021) · doi:10.5556/j.tkjm.52.2021.4087
Conspecifics, not plant reproductive tissues, reduce omnivore prey consumption
Rinehart, S., & Long, J. D. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/596015
Pacioretty, M. T., Martinez, P., Mejia, E. C., Reinhardt, K., Barber, J., de Graaff, M., Kawahara, A., & Aho, K. (2019) · Journal of Arid Environments · doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2018.09.011
From deserts to avocado orchards - understanding realized trophic interactions in communities
Burdon, F. (2018) · Peer Community In Ecology · doi:10.24072/pci.ecology.100008
“” Not content with that damning indictment, he went further by railing that “theorists are trying to explain phenomena that do not exist” [11].”
BackgroundIndirect Long-range Interactions and Network Synchronization
Estrada, E., Gambuzza, L. V., & Frasca, M. (2017) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.01349
A study on the Concept of Complexity - Based on a Review of the Ecology Science Literature -
Kim, G., 전, 영., & 남, 보. (2016) · doi:10.35146/jecoph.2016..21.001
A Bayesian approach to finding groups in a food web
Solow, A., & Beet, A. (2013) · Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1080/15659801.2013.820391
Predation (Including Parasites and Disease) and Herbivory
Hartvigsen, G. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0003310.pub2
Intraspecific variability drives diversity in food webs
Melián, C. J., Vilas, C., Baldó, F., González-Ortegón, E., Drake, P., & Williams, R. J. (2011) · doi:10.1038/npre.2011.6251.1
Conclusions: An Ecosystem Perspective of Shallow Marine Reefs
McClanahan, T., & Branch, G. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195319958.003.0009
Eat and be eaten: Modeling and analysis
Al-Mohanna, S. M. G., Xia, Y., & Zou, L. (2024) · Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2024190
(2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63757-4.16001-2
Controlling mesopredators: importance of behavioural interactions in trophic cascades
Otero, P., & del Mar., M. (2017) · ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) · doi:10.4225/28/5afb6d501fb41
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF FOOD WEBS: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF TROPHIC INTERACTIONS
Morin, P. J. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5337-5_5
Mathematical View Of Community And Ecosystem Processes
Namba, T., & Chon, T. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-2689-8_2
“However, elaborate studies of food webs in the last decade of the 20th century (Winemiller 1990, Martinez 1991, Polis 1991 ) discouraged the premise that we could have found the basic rules that govern the food web architecture (Pimm et al. 1991, Hall and Raffaelli 1993, 1997).”
BackgroundFood web research today with reference to systems including spiders
Ogula, J.-I. (1998) · Acta Arachnologica · doi:10.2476/asjaa.47.59
Metadata
- Authors
- Polis, G. A.
- Corresponding author
- Polis, Gary A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-155
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1999855446
- Cited by
- 1,041
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 20.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Keywords
- food web theory, food web complexity, Coachella Valley, trophic interactions, omnivory, predator-prey ratio, top predators, arthropod communities, soil fauna
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
