The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Genetics of Adaptation: A Reassessment
Abstract
We review both the theory and the data supporting the neo-Darwinian claim that adaptation results from the accumulation of many alleles of small effect. The theory supporting this "micromutationist" view is inconclusive. Furthermore, the evidence from genetic analysis is mixed: although some adaptations are apparently based on many genes of small effect, others clearly involve major genes. Most genetic analyses, moreover, have lacked the power to detect major genes. We conclude that, although the neo-Darwinian view of adaptation may be correct, it is not strongly supported by evidence. The introduction of molecular approaches may, however, finally allow us to resolve this question.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Cited by
Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers ( Mimulus )
Schemske, D. W., & Bradshaw, H. D. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.21.11910 · Cited by 821
Stinchcombe, J. R., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2008) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800937 · Cited by 622
A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation
Berg, J. J., & Coop, G. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004412 · Cited by 487
PERSPECTIVE: EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY AND THE PROBLEM OF VARIATION
Stern, D. L. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00544.x · Cited by 483
(1999) · doi:10.2307/1313476 · Cited by 309
Insecticide resistance genes confer a predation cost on mosquitoes, Culex pipiens
BERTICAT, C., DURON, O., HEYSE, D., & RAYMOND, M. (2004) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672304006792 · Cited by 108
Community-wide genome sequencing reveals 30 years of Darwin’s finch evolution
Enbody, E. D., Sendell-Price, A. T., Sprehn, C. G., Rubin, C.-J., Visscher, P. M., Grant, B. R., Grant, P. R., & Andersson, L. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf6218 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Orr, H. A., & Coyne, J. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 725-742
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2040848353
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
