The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition
Abstract
Because mechanistic models of interspecific interactions are often complex, one should deliberately seek simple unifying principles that transcend system-specific details. Earlier work on resource competition has led to the "R* rule," which states that a dominant competitor suppresses resources to a lower level than any other competing species. This rule describes the outcome of even ornate models of competition. Here we show that analogous simple rules can characterize systems with predation. We first demonstrate, for a simple two-prey, one-predator model without resource competition but with a predator numerical response leading to apparent competition, that the winning prey supports (and withstands) the higher predator density; that is, the outcome is described by a "P* rule." We then develop a general model in which predation is inflicted evenhandedly on two prey species competing for a single resource and show that the R* and P* rules hold: the winning prey both depresses resources to the lowest level and sustains the higher predator density. We next examine a more complex model with differential predation. Assuming a closed system (i.e., a fixed nutrient pool), we portray the four-dimensional system dynamics in a two-dimensional graphical model, and we assess the domain of applicability of simple dominance rules in more complex systems. We address the generality of our conclusions and end by examining the implications of different, reasonable biological constraints for community structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resource Competition between Plankton Algae: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach
Tilman, D. (1977) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1935608 · Cited by 1,253
Self-citationModelling Fluctuating Populations.
Mani, G. S., Nisbet, R. M., & Gurney, W. S. C. (1983) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259993 · Cited by 865
Community Equilibria and Stability, and an Extension of the Competitive Exclusion Principle
Levin, S. A. (1970) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282676 · Cited by 709
Leibold, M. A. (1989) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285022 · Cited by 581
Short-Term Apparent Competition
Holt, R. D., & Kotler, B. P. (1987) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284718 · Cited by 364
Self-citationMechanistic Approaches to Community Ecology: A New Reductionism
SCHOENER, T. W. (1986) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/26.1.81 · Cited by 337
Predation and Resource Partitioning in One Predator -- Two Prey Model Communities
Vance, R. R. (1978) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283324 · Cited by 224
Schmitt, R. J. (1987) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939880 · Cited by 191
Resource Competition in a Variable Environment: Phytoplankton Growing According to Monod's Model
Grover, J. P. (1990) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285131 · Cited by 143
Self-citationPermanent coexistence in general models of three interacting species
Hutson, V., & Law, R. (1985) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00276227 · Cited by 105
Herbivory as a Confounding Factor in an Experiment Measuring Competition Among Plants
Reader, R. J. (1992) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938748 · Cited by 63
Oksanen, L. (1992) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02285331 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
A Theoretical Framework for Intraguild Predation
Holt, R. D., & Polis, G. A. (1997) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/286018 · Cited by 1,245
Self-citationThe Niche Concept Revisited: Mechanistic Models and Community Context
Leibold, M. A. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938141 · Cited by 687
Experimental Tests of the Dependence of Arthropod Diversity on Plant Diversity
Siemann, E., Tilman, D., Haarstad, J., & Ritchie, M. (1998) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/286204 · Cited by 623
Self-citationREVERSAL OF GRAZING IMPACT ON PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN NUTRIENT-POOR VS. NUTRIENT-RICH ECOSYSTEMS
Proulx, M., & Mazumder, A. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2581:rogiop]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 621
Metadata
- Authors
- Holt, R. D., Grover, J., & Tilman, D.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 741-771
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2029775095
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.