Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A New Hypothesis for the Evolution of Viviparity in Reptiles

Shine, Richard·1995·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Viviparity has evolved many times within squamate reptiles, mostly in cool climates, but the selective advantages of uterine retention of eggs remain obscure. Previous analyses have assumed that intrauterine incubation enhances offspring survival because of early hatching or protection of the young in utero. I suggest instead that prolonged uterine retention directly enhances hatchling viability, because eggs incubated at maternal body temperatures produce "better" hatchlings than do eggs incubated at normal nest temperatures. To test this idea, I incubated eggs of two species of montane scincid lizards from southeastern Australia (Bassiana duperreyi and Nannoscincus maccoyi) under thermal regimes designed to simulate temperatures in nests and maternal oviducts. Hatchling phenotypes were substantially affected by incubation temperatures. The variables affected by incubation at maternal versus nest thermal regimes include the hatchling's morphology (body size, relative tail length), running speed in a laboratory raceway, and behavior (activity levels, frequency of basking, antipredator tactics). The running speeds of hatchling B. duperreyi were also influenced by brief retention at "maternal" temperatures after the usual time of laying (a presumed intermediate stage for the evolution of viviparity) and by body temperatures of females prior to oviposition. Hence, a direct effect of uterine retention on offspring viability offers a plausible selective advantage for the evolution of viviparity in squamate reptiles and possibly in other vertebrates and invertebrates also. More generally, the expression of phenotypic plasticity may play an integral role in the adaptive modification of life-history phenomena.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/285769

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Shine, R.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1995-05
Volume
145
Issue
5
Pages
809-823
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2034576176
Cited by
253
References
24
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Hypothesis for the Evolution of Viviparity in Reptiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285769
The paper
Shine, R. (1995). A New Hypothesis for the Evolution of Viviparity in Reptiles. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285769

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.