The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Density-Dependent Selection on Manipulated Stem Length in Impatiens capensis
Abstract
In plants, stem elongation at high density in response to vegetation shade is hypothesized to be an example of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Elongated stems may increase the light capture for plants in dense stands, while nonelongated stems may be favored for plants in low density. We tested the adaptive value of plastic stem elongation in Impatiens capensis by manipulating the controlling light cue, red to far red ratio, to produce elongated and nonelongated plants. These plants were then transplanted into high and low densities in a natural population. The results supported the adaptive plasticity hypothesis; elongated plants were more fit at high density, and suppressed plants were more fit at low density. Phenotypic selection analysis revealed selection for increased height in high density and for decreased height relative to leaf length in low density. Elongated plants showed less growth of the second internode at 2 wk after transplantation in both densities, which suggests a cost of elongation. Direct selection on height explained the fitness differences between suppressed and elongated plants at high density, but it did not completely explain the lower fitness of elongated plants at low density, which implies an intrinsic cost of elongation independent of selection on morphology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Cited by
Phenotypic Plasticity in the Interactions and Evolution of Species
Agrawal, A. A. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060701 · Cited by 1,630
Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions
Richards, C. L., Bossdorf, O., Muth, N. Z., Gurevitch, J., & Pigliucci, M. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x · Cited by 1,456
Ecological Developmental Biology: Developmental Biology Meets the Real World
Gilbert, S. F. (2001) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0210 · Cited by 478
Alpert, P., & Simms, E. L. (2002) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1019684612767 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Dudley, S. A., & Schmitt, J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 445-465
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2080774092
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Density-Dependent Selection on Manipulated Stem Length in Impatiens capensis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285860
- The paper
- Dudley, S. A., & Schmitt, J. (1996). Testing the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Density-Dependent Selection on Manipulated Stem Length in Impatiens capensis. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285860
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.