Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 565

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Testing the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Density-Dependent Selection on Manipulated Stem Length in Impatiens capensis

Dudley, Susan A., Schmitt, Johanna·1996·The American Naturalist

Abstract

In plants, stem elongation at high density in response to vegetation shade is hypothesized to be an example of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Elongated stems may increase the light capture for plants in dense stands, while nonelongated stems may be favored for plants in low density. We tested the adaptive value of plastic stem elongation in Impatiens capensis by manipulating the controlling light cue, red to far red ratio, to produce elongated and nonelongated plants. These plants were then transplanted into high and low densities in a natural population. The results supported the adaptive plasticity hypothesis; elongated plants were more fit at high density, and suppressed plants were more fit at low density. Phenotypic selection analysis revealed selection for increased height in high density and for decreased height relative to leaf length in low density. Elongated plants showed less growth of the second internode at 2 wk after transplantation in both densities, which suggests a cost of elongation. Direct selection on height explained the fitness differences between suppressed and elongated plants at high density, but it did not completely explain the lower fitness of elongated plants at low density, which implies an intrinsic cost of elongation independent of selection on morphology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/285860

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 565

Metadata

Authors
Dudley, S. A., & Schmitt, J.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1996-03
Volume
147
Issue
3
Pages
445-465
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2080774092
Cited by
565
References
1
FWCI
32.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Density-Dependent Selection on Manipulated Stem Length in Impatiens capensis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285860
The paper
Dudley, S. A., & Schmitt, J. (1996). Testing the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Density-Dependent Selection on Manipulated Stem Length in Impatiens capensis. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285860

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.