The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pollen Dispersal in Low-Density Populations of Three Neotropical Tree Species
Abstract
Studies of mating patterns of tropical trees, typically involving common species, have revealed that most species are outcrossed and that, in some cases, a significant fraction of outcross pollen moves long distances. We evaluated mating systems and effective pollen dispersal for three hermaphroditic, insect-pollinated Neotropical tree species, Calophyllum longifolium, Spondias mombin, and Turpinia occidentalis, all of which occurred at low adult densities at the study site. Mating patterns were estimated for each maternal tree within 84-ha populations of C. longifolium and S. mombin in 1992 and 1993 and within a 50-ha population of T. occidentalis in 1993. Each population was 100% outcrossed. Multilocus paternity exclusion analyses indicated that in C. longifolium, a minimum of 62% of effective pollen moved at least 210 m. For S. mombin, estimates of apparent pollen flow greater than 300 m were 5.2% and 2 5% in 1992 and 1993, respectively. For all species, pollen dispersal was strongly affected by the spatial distribution of reproductive trees. Where flowering adults were evenly spaced, a large fraction of effective pollen moved at least a few hundred meters and well beyond the nearest reproductive neighbors. Conversely, where flowering trees were clumped, the majority of matings were among near neighbors. The minimum area required to encompass a natural breeding unit was estimated for each population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Life after logging: reconciling wildlife conservation and production forestry in Indonesian Borneo
E., M., D., S., R., N., D., A., B., R., D., I., T., S., A., L., I., R., A., W., et al. (2005) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/001663 · Cited by 296
Cascante, A., Quesada, M., Lobo, J. J., & Fuchs, E. A. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00317.x · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Stacy, E. A., Hamrick, J. L., Nason, J. D., Hubbell, S. P., Foster, R. B., & Condit, R.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-298
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2047390770
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pollen Dispersal in Low-Density Populations of Three Neotropical Tree Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285925
- The paper
- Stacy, E. A., Hamrick, J. L., Nason, J. D., Hubbell, S. P., Foster, R. B., & Condit, R. (1996). Pollen Dispersal in Low-Density Populations of Three Neotropical Tree Species. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285925
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.