The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sperm Competition in Fishes: The Evolution of Testis Size and Ejaculate Characteristics
Abstract
Fishes show one of the widest ranges of sperm competition intensity of any animal group. Here we present a comparative study whose aim is to investigate the effect of relative intensity of sperm competition on investment in spermatogenesis and the number and size of sperm produced. We find that both the gonadosomatic index (GSI = [gonad weight/body weight] x 100) and sperm numbers increase with intensity of sperm competition across species but that sperm length decreases. These new findings are consistent with a raffle-based mode of sperm competition in fishes. Most of these results (positive correlation of the GSI and sperm number with sperm competition intensity) concur with the predictions of current sperm competition theory. However, we also find that sperm longevity decreases with sperm length across species. Current models for continuous fertilization suggest that if length increases a sperm's speed but decreases its longevity, sperm length should increase with sperm competition intensity, whereas models for instant fertilization suggest that sperm length should remain constant. The negative relationship found between sperm competition and sperm length therefore does not fit predictions of either model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS
PARKER, G. A. (1970) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x · Cited by 3,596
Self-citation
Cited by
Preston, B. T., Stevenson, I. R., Pemberton, J. M., Coltman, D. W., & Wilson, K. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2268 · Cited by 358
Sperm wars and the evolution of male fertility
Simmons, L. W., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2012) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep-12-0285 · Cited by 346
Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0189 · Cited by 314
Sperm competition experiments between lines of crickets producing different sperm lengths
Morrow, E. H., & Gage, M. J. G. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1807 · Cited by 61
Self-citationPaternity in horseshoe crabs when spawning in multiple-male groups
Brockmann, H. J., Nguyen, C., & Potts, W. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1547 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Stockley, P., Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. A., & Møller, A. P.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 933-954
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2126945764
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sperm Competition in Fishes: The Evolution of Testis Size and Ejaculate Characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/286031
- The paper
- Stockley, P., Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. A., & Møller, A. P. (1997). Sperm Competition in Fishes: The Evolution of Testis Size and Ejaculate Characteristics. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/286031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.