The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis
Abstract
A considerable body of primary research has accumulated over the last 10 yr testing the relationship between developmental instability in the form of fluctuating asymmetry and performance of individuals in mating success itself or sexual attractiveness. This research comprises 146 samples from 65 studies of 42 species of four major taxa. We present the results of a meta-analysis of these studies, which demonstrates that there is indeed an overall significant, moderate negative relationship: for studies, the overall mean Pearson's r or effect size = -.42, P <.0005; for species, the overall mean r = -.34, .01 < P < .025. Based on calculated fail-safe numbers, the effect-size estimates are highly robust against any publication or reporting bias that may exist. There is considerable evidence that the magnitude of the negative correlation between fluctuating asymmetry and success related to sexual selection is greater for males than for females, when a secondary sexual trait rather than an ordinary trait is studied, with experimentation compared with observation, and for traits not involved with mobility compared with traits affecting mobility. There is also limited evidence that higher taxa may differ in effect size and that intensity of sexual selection negatively correlates with effect size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation
Ewers, R. M., & Didham, R. K. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006949 · Cited by 2,218
Rosenberg, M. S. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01004.x · Cited by 1,285
Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why.
Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468 · Cited by 699
Dongen, S. V. (2006) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01175.x · Cited by 561
Female preference for male faces changes cyclically
Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(99)00033-1 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174-192
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2071989873
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/286110
- The paper
- Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/286110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.