The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colony Size and Individual Fitness in the Social Spider Anelosimus eximius
Abstract
The effects of colony size on individual fitness and its components were investigated in artificially established and natural colonies of the social spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). In the tropical rain forest understory at a site in eastern Ecuador, females in colonies containing between 23-107 females had india significantly higher lifetime reproductive success than females in smaller colonies. Among larger colonies, this trend apparently reversed. This overall fitness function was a result of the conflicting effects of colony size on different components of fitness. In particular, the probability of offspring survival to maturity increased with colony size while the probability of a female reproducing within the colonies decreased with colony size. Average clutch size increased with colony size when few or no wasp parasitoids were present in the egg sacs. With a high incidence of egg sac parasitoids, this effect disappeared because larger colonies were more likely to be infected. The product of the three fitness components measured-probability of female reproduction, average clutch size, and offspring survival-produced a function that is consistent with direct estimates of the average female lifetime reproductive success obtained by dividing the total number of offspring maturing in a colony by the number of females in the parental generation. Selection, therefore, should favor group living and intermediate colony sizes in this social spider.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect
Courchamp, F., Clutton-Brock, T., & Grenfell, B. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01683-3 · Cited by 1,548
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
Multiple Allee effects and population management
Berec, L., Angulo, E., & Courchamp, F. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.12.002 · Cited by 710
Solomon, N. G., & Crist, T. O. (2008) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.028 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Avilés, L., & Tufiño, P.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 403-418
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2170135844
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colony Size and Individual Fitness in the Social Spider Anelosimus eximius. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/286178
- The paper
- Avilés, L., & Tufiño, P. (1998). Colony Size and Individual Fitness in the Social Spider Anelosimus eximius. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/286178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.