Cited by 3,937Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Analysis and Corporate GovernanceCorporate Finance and Governance

Mutual Fund Performance

Sharpe, William F.·1966·The Journal of Business

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/294846

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sharpe Ratio and Maximum Drawdown are used to assess risk of trading performance.

    “Sharpe Ratio [44] and Maximum Drawdown are used to assess the risk of the trading performance.”

    From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 3,937

Authors
Sharpe, W. F.
Corresponding author
Sharpe, William F.
Venue
The Journal of Business
Published
1966-01
Volume
39
Issue
S1
Pages
119
ISSN
  • 0021-9398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5374
OpenAlex
W4241584625
Cited by
3,937
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 220 · 2025: 213 · 2024: 211 · 2023: 250 · 2022: 193 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 179 · 2018: 169 · 2017: 167 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 164 · 2014: 154 · 2013: 133 · 2012: 156
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Business (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
Keywords
mutual fund performance, fund returns, investment performance evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review