Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Portfolio Theory: A Step Toward Its Practical Application

Blume, Marshall E.·1970·The Journal of Business

Abstract

The modern theory of portfolio analysis dates from the pioneering work of Markowitz.' Of paramount importance to the practical application of this theory is the ability to assess accurately the future performance of portfolios of risky assets. With accurate assessments, an investor can optimize his choice of a portfolio on the two dimensions of risk and expected return. In spite of the need of obtaining accurate assessments of future performance in applying portfolio analysis to a practical situation, there has been virtually no statistical analysis of the empirical properties of explicit methods of assessing future performance. This paper proposes two different methods of assessing future performance or, more technically, of assessing predictive or subjective distributions of future returns. These two different methods will be compared by evaluating the accuracy of the predictive distributions derived under these two alternatives, using as a criterion the degree of approximation between these predictive distributions and the underlying distributions generating the future returns. After reviewing some of the more important theoretical and empirical properties of symmetric, stable distributions in section II, section III develops the first method which assesses predictive distributions of the returns for all the assets individually and then aggregates these distributions into predictive distributions for portfolios. This procedure is implicit in Sharpe's well-known diagonal algorithm for calculating the efficient set.2 This paper shows that this first method of aggregation requires certain empirical assumptions about the predictive distributions for the individual assets. After sections IV and V describe the sample and the statistical design, section VI uses this first method to assess predictive distributions for a sample of portfolios of common stocks using historical data and compares these predictive distributions to the generating distributions of the future returns. The closeness of the approximation of these predictive distributions to the future generating distributions varies considerably with the particular empirical assumptions used in the process of aggregation. The second method to be presented in section VII assesses the predictive distributions of future returns for portfolios directly rather than first assessing the distributions for the individual assets. This second or alternative method still requires some of the assumptions needed by the first method. Neverthe* The author is deeply indebted to Professors Eugene Fama, Lawrence Fisher, Merton Miller, and Harry Roberts for their very helpful advice. In addition, the comments of Professors Robert Keeley, Benjamin King, Michael Jensen, and Myron Scholes were appreciated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/295262

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Blume, M. E.
Venue
The Journal of Business
Published
1970-01
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
152
ISSN
  • 0021-9398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5374
OpenAlex
W2004035891
Cited by
212
References
0
FWCI
13.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Portfolio Theory: A Step Toward Its Practical Application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/295262
The paper
Blume, M. E. (1970). Portfolio Theory: A Step Toward Its Practical Application. The Journal of Business. https://doi.org/10.1086/295262

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.