The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparison of the Stable and Student Distributions as Statistical Models for Stock Prices
Abstract
There has been a great deal of discussion about the statistical distribution of rates of return on common stocks. At an early stage the prevalent belief was that distributions of rates of return on common stocks were adequately characterized by the normal distribution. This belief seemed to be consistent with the pioneering work of Bachelier.1 It was also observed, however, that empirical distributions of such returns had more kurtosis (i.e., fatter tails) than that predicted by the normal distribution. The evidence provided by Mandelbrot and Fama suggested that one could explicitly account for the observed fat tails by using the symmetric-stable distribution.2 This article considers another family of symmetric distributions that can also account for the observed fat tails of returns distribution. This alternative is the Student (or t) distribution. It will be indicated that this alternative model has implications for empirical and theoretical work that are quite different from those of the symmetric-stable model. The descriptive validity of the Student model, relative to that of the symmetric-stable model, will be assessed using actual daily rates of return. This article is organized as follows: Section II describes the prop-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics: Application to Financial Markets
HSIEH, D. A. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04646.x · Cited by 1,046
Models of Stock Returns—A Comparison
KON, S. J. (1984) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03865.x · Cited by 600
Chen, A.-S., Leung, M. T., & Daouk, H. (2003) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/s0305-0548(02)00037-0 · Cited by 527
Option Pricing when the Variance is Changing
Johnson, H., & Shanno, D. (1987) · The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.2307/2330709 · Cited by 375
Of Smiles and Smirks: A Term Structure Perspective
Das, S. R., & Sundaram, R. K. (1999) · The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.2307/2676279 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Blattberg, R. C., & Gonedes, N. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Business
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1974-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244
- ISSN
- 0021-9398 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5374
- OpenAlex
- W2109542379
- Cited by
- 900
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of the Stable and Student Distributions as Statistical Models for Stock Prices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/295634
- The paper
- Blattberg, R. C., & Gonedes, N. J. (1974). A Comparison of the Stable and Student Distributions as Statistical Models for Stock Prices. The Journal of Business. https://doi.org/10.1086/295634
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.