Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice Among Products
Abstract
I understand the discipline of marketing exists to answer questions such as: Will housepersons buy more Brand A soap if its perfume content is increased? Traditional econometric demand analysis provides no answer. Its attention has been concentrated on consumption levels of broad commodity classes (e.g., housing services), examined using aggregate market data, with demand models constructed on the twin pillars of economic rationality and consumer sovereignty. The market researcher has understandably looked elsewhere-to psychology and survey research-for answers to his questions. Realities have forced econometric demand analysts to broaden their perspective. Public intervention in the supply of some commodities, notably in the areas of transportation, energy, and communications, have required economists to recognize the marketing considerations implicit in issues of policy. (The decision of whether to build and how to design a public This paper reviews several recent developments in econometric demand analysis which may be of interest in market research. Econometric models of probabilistic choice, suitable for forecasting choice among existing or new brands, or switching between brands, are surveyed. These models incorporate attribute descriptions of commodities, making them statistical counterparts of the Court-GrilichesLancaster theory of consumer behavior. Particular attention is given to models which yield tree structures of similarities between alternatives. Also reviewed…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While RLHF substantially enhances the performance of LLMs and aligns them with human preferences, it is not without limitations, including text hallucination, bias and toxicity, and generation of harmful text when probed.
“While RLHF substantially enhances the performance of LLMs and aligns them with human preferences, it is not without its limitations.These include, but are not limited to, issues such as text hallucination [115], bias and toxicity [37,48,58], and the generation of harmful text when probed [142,189].”
From RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs (2026) · cites this paper as [115]
Cites
Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis.
Luce, R. D. (2005) · doi:10.1037/14396-000 · Cited by 1,157 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The Luce model has been employed for market analysis in economics with reasonable success, notably in transportation planning where it has been used to forecast market penetration of new travel modes (see McFadden [1974; McFadden and Associates 1977]; for a survey of other empirical applications, see McFadden [1976]).”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improved representation of investment decisions in assessments of CO2 mitigation
Iyer, G. C., Clarke, L. E., Edmonds, J. A., Flannery, B. P., Hultman, N. E., McJeon, H. C., & Victor, D. G. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2553 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
The contribution of Paris to limit global warming to 2 °C
Iyer, G. C., Edmonds, J. A., Fawcett, A. A., Hultman, N. E., Alsalam, J., Asrar, G. R., Calvin, K. V., Clarke, L. E., Creason, J., Jeong, M., et al. (2015) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125002 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Chaudhari, S., Aggarwal, P., Murahari, V., Rajpurohit, T., Kalyan, A., Narasimhan, K., Deshpande, A., & Castro da Silva, B. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3743127 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Shomotova, A., ElSayary, A., & Husain, S. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13832-x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Role of Environmental Predictability and Costs in Relying on Automation
Sutherland, S. C., Harteveld, C., & Young, M. E. (2015) · Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702609 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- McFadden, D.
- Corresponding author
- McFadden, Daniel
- ORCID
- McFadden, Daniel
- Venue
- The Journal of Business
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1980-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- S3
- Pages
- S13
- ISSN
- 0021-9398 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5374
- OpenAlex
- W1995500779
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 23
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Business (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- probabilistic choice, brand choice, brand switching, product attributes, consumer behavior, market analysis, consumer sovereignty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review