Cited by 766Economic and Environmental ValuationConsumer Market Behavior and PricingDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice Among Products

McFadden, Daniel·1980·The Journal of Business

Abstract

I understand the discipline of marketing exists to answer questions such as: Will housepersons buy more Brand A soap if its perfume content is increased? Traditional econometric demand analysis provides no answer. Its attention has been concentrated on consumption levels of broad commodity classes (e.g., housing services), examined using aggregate market data, with demand models constructed on the twin pillars of economic rationality and consumer sovereignty. The market researcher has understandably looked elsewhere-to psychology and survey research-for answers to his questions. Realities have forced econometric demand analysts to broaden their perspective. Public intervention in the supply of some commodities, notably in the areas of transportation, energy, and communications, have required economists to recognize the marketing considerations implicit in issues of policy. (The decision of whether to build and how to design a public This paper reviews several recent developments in econometric demand analysis which may be of interest in market research. Econometric models of probabilistic choice, suitable for forecasting choice among existing or new brands, or switching between brands, are surveyed. These models incorporate attribute descriptions of commodities, making them statistical counterparts of the Court-GrilichesLancaster theory of consumer behavior. Particular attention is given to models which yield tree structures of similarities between alternatives. Also reviewed…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/296093

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While RLHF substantially enhances the performance of LLMs and aligns them with human preferences, it is not without limitations, including text hallucination, bias and toxicity, and generation of harmful text when probed.

    “While RLHF substantially enhances the performance of LLMs and aligns them with human preferences, it is not without its limitations.These include, but are not limited to, issues such as text hallucination [115], bias and toxicity [37,48,58], and the generation of harmful text when probed [142,189].”

Cites

  • “The Luce model has been employed for market analysis in economics with reasonable success, notably in transportation planning where it has been used to forecast market penetration of new travel modes (see McFadden [1974; McFadden and Associates 1977]; for a survey of other empirical applications, see McFadden [1976]).”
    BackgroundMethod

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McFadden, D.
Corresponding author
McFadden, Daniel
Venue
The Journal of Business
Published
1980-01
Volume
53
Issue
S3
Pages
S13
ISSN
  • 0021-9398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5374
OpenAlex
W1995500779
Cited by
766
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 23
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Business (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
probabilistic choice, brand choice, brand switching, product attributes, consumer behavior, market analysis, consumer sovereignty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review