The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Trend in the Male-Female Wage Gap in the United States
Abstract
Despite the rise in the feminist movement, the enactment of equal opportunity legislation, and the rapid increase in women's labor force participation, a substantial sex differential in wages has persisted in the United States for at least 4 decades. Measured by hourly earnings of year-round workers, this wage gap was 31% in 1955, widened to a 35%-37% range by the 1960s and early 1970s, and then narrowed to 33% by 1982. This paper examines the extent to which changes in the characteristics of men and women in the labor force and other factors can account for the observed pattern. The main finding is that increases in women's labor force participation were initially associated with a declining skill level of employed women relative to employed men, where skill is measured by years of schooling and job tenure. More recently the work experience of employed women has been increasing, which helps account for the recent narrowing trend in the wage gap. During the 1970s the wage gap probably woul have narrowed more significantly had it not been for high levels of unemployment combined with the downward pressure on wages of less skilled workers arising from rapid increases in the supply of young workers and women. Gains by younger women in work expectations, work experience, and college enrollment and other work-related investments point to a further narrowing of the wage gap in the next decade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Meta-Analysis of the International Gender Wage Gap: Meta-Analysis of the International Wage Gap
Weichselbaumer, D., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2005) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00256.x · Cited by 708
Discrimination in an Equilibrium Search Model
Black, D. A. (1995) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/298376 · Cited by 353
Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market
Layard, R., Nickell, S., & Jackman, R. (2005) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279166.001.0001 · Cited by 325
She Works Hard for the Money: Household Responsibilities and the Allocation of Work Effort
Bielby, D. D., & Bielby, W. T. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228863 · Cited by 295
Gender Wage Discrimination Bias? A Meta-Regression Analysis
Stanley, T. D., & Jarrell, S. B. (1998) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/146404 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Neill, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Labor Economics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1, Part 2
- Pages
- S91-S116
- ISSN
- 0734-306X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5307
- OpenAlex
- W2002607595
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Trend in the Male-Female Wage Gap in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/298077
- The paper
- O'Neill, J. (1985). The Trend in the Male-Female Wage Gap in the United States. Journal of Labor Economics. https://doi.org/10.1086/298077
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.