The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corridor Use Predicted from Behaviors at Habitat Boundaries
Abstract
Through empirical studies and simulation, I demonstrate how simple behaviors can be used in lieu of detailed dispersal studies to predict the effects of corridors on interpatch movements. Movement paths of three butterfly species were measured in large (1.64 ha) experimental patches of open habitat, some of which were connected by corridors. Butterflies that "reflected" off boundaries between open patches and the surrounding forest also emigrated from patches through corridors at rates higher than expected from random movement. This was observed for two open-habitat species, Eurema nicippe and Phoebis sennae; however, edges and corridors had no effect on a habitat generalist, Papilio troilus. Behaviorally based simulation models, which departed from correlated random walks only at habitat boundaries, predicted that corridors increase interpatch movement rates of both open-habitat species. Models also predicted that corridors have proportionately greater effects as corridor width increases, that movement rates increase before leveling off as corridor width increases, and that corridor effects decrease as patch size increases. This study suggests that corridors direct movements of habitat-restricted species and that local behaviors may be used to predict the conservation potential of corridors in fragmented landscapes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bracken, L. J., & Croke, J. (2007) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.6313 · Cited by 914
A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics
Calabrese, J. M., & Fagan, W. F. (2004) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:acgtcm]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 394
Potential negative ecological effects of corridors
HADDAD, N. M., BRUDVIG, L. A., DAMSCHEN, E. I., EVANS, D. M., JOHNSON, B. L., LEVEY, D. J., ORROCK, J. L., RESASCO, J., SULLIVAN, L. L., TEWKSBURY, J. J., et al. (2014) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12323 · Cited by 195
Self-citationConnectivity measures: a review
Kindlmann, P., & Burel, F. (2008) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9245-4 · Cited by 124
Merckx, T., Dyck, H. V., Karlsson, B., & Leimar, O. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2459 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Haddad, N. M.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-227
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2177316900
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corridor Use Predicted from Behaviors at Habitat Boundaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303163
- The paper
- Haddad, N. M. (1999). Corridor Use Predicted from Behaviors at Habitat Boundaries. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/303163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.