The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Selection Mosaic and Diversifying Coevolution between Crossbills and Lodgepole Pine
Abstract
Asymmetrical competition determines which of two seed predators drives the evolution of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia) cones. Red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) are effective preemptive competitors in lodgepole pine forests so that red crossbills (Loxia curvirostra) are uncommon and selection from Tamiasciurus drives cone evolution. When Tamiasciurus are absent, crossbills increase in abundance and coevolve in an evolutionary arms race with pine. Similarly, Tamiasciurus alters the evolutionary trajectories of large-seeded pines, many of which rely on birds (Corvidae) for their seed dispersal. Populations therefore exhibit a selection mosaic with coevolutionary hot spots. In the coevolutionary hot spots, divergent selection on crossbills potentially leads to reproductive isolation and speciation. This results in a subsequent reduction in the geographic mosaic but diversifies the adaptive landscape on which crossbills have radiated. Thus, divergent selection is a double-edged sword. Divergent selection is critical in creating a selection mosaic but erodes the selection mosaic when it promotes reproductive isolation and speciation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adaptive differentiation following experimental island colonization in Anolis lizards
Losos, J. B., Warheitt, K. I., & Schoener, T. W. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387070a0 · Cited by 464
Cited by
The Evolution of Predator-Prey Interactions: Theory and Evidence
Abrams, P. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.79 · Cited by 912
Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection
Thompson, J. N., & Cunningham, B. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00810 · Cited by 465
Brodie, E. D., Ridenhour, B. J., & Brodie, E. D. (2002) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00132.x · Cited by 365
Agosta, S. J., Janz, N., & Brooks, D. R. (2010) · Zoologia (Curitiba) · doi:10.1590/s1984-46702010000200001 · Cited by 316
Testing for coevolutionary diversification: linking pattern with process
Althoff, D. M., Segraves, K. A., & Johnson, M. T. J. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.11.003 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Benkman, C. W.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- S5
- Pages
- S75-S91
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2163567615
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Selection Mosaic and Diversifying Coevolution between Crossbills and Lodgepole Pine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303213
- The paper
- Benkman, C. W. (1999). The Selection Mosaic and Diversifying Coevolution between Crossbills and Lodgepole Pine. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/303213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.