Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dense Gas and Star Formation: Characteristics of Cloud Cores Associated with Water Masers

Open access
Plume, Rene, Jaffe, D. T., Evans II, Neal J., Martin‐Pintado, J., Gomez‐Gonzalez, J.·1997·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We have observed 150 regions of massive star formation, selected originally by the presence of an H 2 O maser, in the J = 5 → 4, 3 → 2, and 2 → 1 transitions of CS, and 49 regions in the same transitions of C 34 S. Over 90% of the 150 regions were detected in the J = 2 → 1 and 3 → 2 transitions of CS, and 75% were detected in the J = 5 → 4 transition. We have combined the data with the J = 7 → 6 data from our original (1992) survey to determine the density by analyzing the excitation of the rotational levels. Using large velocity gradient models, we have determined densities and column densities for 71 of these regions. The gas densities are very high (⟨log n ⟩ = 5.9), but much less than the critical density of the J = 7 → 6 line. Small maps of 25 of the sources in the J = 5 → 4 line yield a mean diameter of 1.0 pc. Several estimates of the mass of dense gas were made for the sources for which we had sufficient information. The mean virial mass is 3800 M ☉ . The mean ratio of bolometric luminosity to virial mass ( L / M ) is 190, about 50 times higher than estimates made using CO emission, suggesting that star formation is much more efficient in the dense gas probed in this study. The depletion time for the dense gas is ~1.3 × 10 7 yr, comparable to the timescale for gas dispersal around open clusters and OB associations. We find no statistically significant line width-size or density-size relationships in our data. Instead, both line width and density are greater for a given size than would be predicted by the usual relationships. We find that the line width increases with density, the opposite of what would be predicted by the usual arguments. We estimate that the luminosity of our Galaxy (excluding the inner 400 pc) in the CS J = 5 → 4 transition is 15-23 L ☉ , considerably less than the luminosity in this line within the central 100 pc of NGC 253 and M82. In addition, the ratio of far-infrared luminosity to CS luminosity is higher in M82 than in any cloud in our sample.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/303654

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Plume, R., Jaffe, D. T., Evans II, N. J., Martin‐Pintado, J., & Gomez‐Gonzalez, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1997-02-20
Volume
476
Issue
2
Pages
730-749
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1996512209
Cited by
262
References
0
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dense Gas and Star Formation: Characteristics of Cloud Cores Associated with Water Masers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303654
The paper
Plume, R., Jaffe, D. T., Evans II, N. J., Martin‐Pintado, J., & Gomez‐Gonzalez, J. (1997). Dense Gas and Star Formation: Characteristics of Cloud Cores Associated with Water Masers. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/303654

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.