Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Star Formation in Magnetic Clouds

Open access
Nakano, Takenori·1998·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

This paper reexamines the widely accepted assumption that low-mass stars form mainly in magnetically subcritical cloud cores and high-mass stars form in magnetically supercritical ones. Cloud cores, as well as molecular clouds, are shown to be magnetically supercritical because although the cores are generally observed as portions of a molecular cloud having considerably higher column densities than their surroundings, magnetically subcritical condensations embedded in a cloud are not very likely to have higher column densities than their surroundings, and because it is difficult to maintain the nonthermal velocity dispersions widely observed in the cores for a significant fraction of their lifetimes if the cores are magnetically subcritical. In a magnetically supercritical condensation, which we call a core, for the pressure P s of the surrounding medium there is a critical value P cr above which the core cannot be in magnetohydrostatic equilibrium and collapses; P cr depends sharply on the core mass, on the effective sound velocity in the core, which includes the effect of turbulence, and on the effective coefficient a eff for the gravity diluted by magnetic force. The cloud core begins dynamical contraction when P cr has decreased below P s by some mechanism. Dissipation of turbulence is the most important process in reducing P cr . Therefore, in most cases, the timescale of star formation in each core is the dissipation time of turbulence, which is several times the free-fall time of the core. For the cores of magnetic flux Φ very close to the critical flux Φ cr or with small a eff ≈ 1 - (Φ/Φ cr ) 2 , P cr will not decrease below P s even when turbulence has completely dissipated; this will happen only in very low mass cores because of the sharp mass dependence of P cr . Such cores begin dynamical contraction after a eff has increased somewhat because of magnetic flux loss from their central parts by ambipolar diffusion; for this to happen, only a slight loss of magnetic flux is needed because of sharp dependence of P cr on Φ at Φ ≈ Φ cr . The timescale of star formation in this case is not much different from the dissipation time of the turbulence, though the probability that the cores have Φ ≈ Φ cr must be low. It is shown to be implausible that cloud cores form from magnetically subcritical condensations via ambipolar diffusion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/305230

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Nakano, T.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1998-02-20
Volume
494
Issue
2
Pages
587-604
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2012547924
Cited by
248
References
0
FWCI
20.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Star Formation in Magnetic Clouds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/305230
The paper
Nakano, T. (1998). Star Formation in Magnetic Clouds. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/305230

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.