The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Star Formation in Magnetic Clouds
Open accessAbstract
This paper reexamines the widely accepted assumption that low-mass stars form mainly in magnetically subcritical cloud cores and high-mass stars form in magnetically supercritical ones. Cloud cores, as well as molecular clouds, are shown to be magnetically supercritical because although the cores are generally observed as portions of a molecular cloud having considerably higher column densities than their surroundings, magnetically subcritical condensations embedded in a cloud are not very likely to have higher column densities than their surroundings, and because it is difficult to maintain the nonthermal velocity dispersions widely observed in the cores for a significant fraction of their lifetimes if the cores are magnetically subcritical. In a magnetically supercritical condensation, which we call a core, for the pressure P s of the surrounding medium there is a critical value P cr above which the core cannot be in magnetohydrostatic equilibrium and collapses; P cr depends sharply on the core mass, on the effective sound velocity in the core, which includes the effect of turbulence, and on the effective coefficient a eff for the gravity diluted by magnetic force. The cloud core begins dynamical contraction when P cr has decreased below P s by some mechanism. Dissipation of turbulence is the most important process in reducing P cr . Therefore, in most cases, the timescale of star formation in each core is the dissipation time of turbulence, which is several times the free-fall time of the core. For the cores of magnetic flux Φ very close to the critical flux Φ cr or with small a eff ≈ 1 - (Φ/Φ cr ) 2 , P cr will not decrease below P s even when turbulence has completely dissipated; this will happen only in very low mass cores because of the sharp mass dependence of P cr . Such cores begin dynamical contraction after a eff has increased somewhat because of magnetic flux loss from their central parts by ambipolar diffusion; for this to happen, only a slight loss of magnetic flux is needed because of sharp dependence of P cr on Φ at Φ ≈ Φ cr . The timescale of star formation in this case is not much different from the dissipation time of the turbulence, though the probability that the cores have Φ ≈ Φ cr must be low. It is shown to be implausible that cloud cores form from magnetically subcritical condensations via ambipolar diffusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds: Observations Confront Theory
Crutcher, R. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307483 · Cited by 915
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakano, T.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1998-02-20
- Volume
- 494
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 587-604
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2012547924
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Star Formation in Magnetic Clouds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/305230
- The paper
- Nakano, T. (1998). Star Formation in Magnetic Clouds. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/305230
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.