The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accretion and the Evolution of T Tauri Disks
Open accessAbstract
Using results and calibrations from a previous paper (Gullbring et al. 1997), we estimate disk accretion rates for pre-main-sequence stars in the Taurus and Chamaeleon I molecular cloud complexes. The median accretion rate for T Tauri stars of age ~1 Myr is ~10 -8 M ☉ yr -1 ; the intrinsic scatter at a given age may be as large as 1 order of magnitude. There is a clear decline of mass accretion rates with increasing age t among T Tauri stars. Representing this decline as ∝ t η , we estimate 1.5 ≲ η ≲ 2.8; the large uncertainty is due to the wide range of accretion rates at a given age, the limited age range of the sample, and errors in estimating stellar ages and accretion luminosities. Adopting values of η near the low end of this range, which are more likely given probable errors and the neglect of birthline age corrections, masses accreted during the T Tauri phase are roughly consistent with disk masses estimated from millimeter-wave dust emission. Similarity solutions for evolving, expanding disks are used to investigate observational constraints on disk properties employing a minimum of parameters. For an assumed power-law form of the disk viscosity with radius ν ∝ R γ , η ≳ 1.5 corresponds to γ ≳ 1. The limit γ ~ 1 corresponds to a roughly constant "α" in the Shakura-Sunyaev (1973) viscosity parameterization; using current observed disk sizes, we estimate α ~ 10 -2 (on scales ~10-100 AU). Much of the observed variation in mass accretion rates can be accounted for by varying initial disk masses between 0.01 and 0.2 M ☉ , but this result may be strongly affected by the presence of binary companion stars. These results emphasize the need for older samples of stars for studying disk evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
Protoplanetary Disks and Their Evolution
Williams, J. P., & Cieza, L. A. (2011) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102548 · Cited by 1,403
Protoplanetary disk structures in Ophiuchus
Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., Qi, C., & Dullemond, C. P. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1502 · Cited by 709
Models of giant planet formation with migration and disc evolution
Alibert, Y., Mordasini, C., Benz, W., & Winisdoerffer, C. (2005) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042032 · Cited by 685
Dynamics and Origin of the 2 : 1 Orbital Resonances of the GJ 876 Planets
Lee, M. H., & Peale, S. J. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/338504 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., & D'Alessio, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 495
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 385-400
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2007116956
- Cited by
- 1,569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accretion and the Evolution of T Tauri Disks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/305277
- The paper
- Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., & D'Alessio, P. (1998). Accretion and the Evolution of T Tauri Disks. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/305277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.