The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Pistol Star
Open accessAbstract
We present new near-infrared data and analysis, which indicate that the Pistol Star is one of the most luminous stars known, adding another test point for massive star formation and stellar evolution theories. We estimate an extinction of A K = 3.2 ± 0.5 using the near-infrared colors of the star and of surrounding stars in the young Quintuplet cluster. Using our wind/atmosphere code, we find two families of models that fit the spectral energy distribution and detailed line profiles. The lower luminosity models give L = 10 6.6±0.2 L ☉ and T eff = 10 4.15±0.01 K, while the higher luminosity models give L = 10 7.2±0.2 L ☉ and T eff = 10 4.33±0.01 K; the error in luminosity assumes an uncertainty of ±0.5 in A K , while the error in T eff is constrained by detailed line modeling. The models also reveal a helium enriched surface. As previously existing stellar evolution models do not extend to such high luminosities, we employ new evolutionary tracks for very massive stars to determine the initial mass and age of the Pistol Star, and estimate M initial = 200-250 M ☉ and an age of 1.7-2.1 Myr. The inferred luminosity and temperature place the star in a sparsely populated zone in the H-R diagram where luminous blue variables (LBVs) are often found. This is consistent with our evolutionary models, which predict that the star is in an unstable evolutionary stage. We interpret the star and its surrounding nebula as an LBV that has recently ejected large amounts of material. Our K -band speckle-imaging data reveal the star to be single down to a projected separation of 110 AU.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yusef-Zadeh, F., & Morris, M. (1987) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/114555 · Cited by 146
Self-citation
Cited by
Toward Understanding Massive Star Formation
Zinnecker, H., & Yorke, H. W. (2007) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092549 · Cited by 1,248
Kudritzki, R.-P., & Puls, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.613 · Cited by 771
Mass loss from hot massive stars
Puls, J., Vink, J. S., & Najarro, F. (2008) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-008-0015-8 · Cited by 630
Self-citationHubble Space Telescope/NICMOS Observations of Massive Stellar Clusters near the Galactic Center
Figer, D. F., Kim, S. S., Morris, M., Serabyn, E., Rich, R. M., & McLean, I. S. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307937 · Cited by 393
Self-citationThe First Cosmic Structures and Their Effects
Ciardi, B., & Ferrara, A. (2005) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-005-3592-0 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Figer, D. F., Najarro, F., Morris, M., McLean, I. S., Geballe, T. R., Ghez, A. M., & Langer, N.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1998-10-10
- Volume
- 506
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 384-404
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1981525549
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pistol Star. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/306237
- The paper
- Figer, D. F., Najarro, F., Morris, M., McLean, I. S., Geballe, T. R., Ghez, A. M., & Langer, N. (1998). The Pistol Star. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/306237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.