Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stochastic Nonlinear Galaxy Biasing

Open access
Dekel, Avishai, Lahav, Ofer·1999·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We propose a general formalism for galaxy biasing and apply it to methods for measuring cosmological parameters, such as regression of light versus mass, the analysis of redshift distortions, measures involving skewness, and the cosmic virial theorem. The common linear and deterministic relation g = b δ between the density fluctuation fields of galaxies g and mass δ is replaced by the conditional distribution P ( g |δ) of these random fields, smoothed at a given scale at a given time. The nonlinearity is characterized by the conditional mean ⟨ g |δ⟩ ≡ b (δ)δ, while the local scatter is represented by the conditional variance σ 2 b (δ) and higher moments. The scatter arises from hidden factors affecting galaxy formation and from shot noise unless it has been properly removed. For applications involving second-order local moments, the biasing is defined by three natural parameters: the slope of the regression of g on δ, a nonlinearity , and a scatter σ b . The ratio of variances b 2 var and the correlation coefficient r mix these parameters. The nonlinearity and the scatter lead to underestimates of order 2 / 2 and σ 2 b / 2 in the different estimators of β (~ Ω 0.6 / ). The nonlinear effects are typically smaller. Local stochasticity affects the redshift-distortion analysis only by limiting the useful range of scales, especially for power spectra. In this range, for linear stochastic biasing, the analysis reduces to Kaiser's formula for (not b var ), independent of the scatter. The distortion analysis is affected by nonlinear properties of biasing but in a weak way. Estimates of the nontrivial features of the biasing scheme are made based on simulations and toy models, and strategies for measuring them are discussed. They may partly explain the range of estimates for β.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/307428

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Dekel, A., & Lahav, O.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1999-07-20
Volume
520
Issue
1
Pages
24-34
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2029030444
Cited by
367
References
2
FWCI
23.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic Nonlinear Galaxy Biasing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/307428
The paper
Dekel, A., & Lahav, O. (1999). Stochastic Nonlinear Galaxy Biasing. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/307428

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.