The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cosmic Antiprotons as a Probe for Supersymmetric Dark Matter?
Open accessAbstract
The flux of cosmic-ray antiprotons from neutralino annihilations in the Galactic halo is computed for a large sample of models in the minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model (MSSM). We also revisit the problem of estimating the background of low-energy cosmic-ray-induced secondary antiprotons, taking into account their subsequent interactions (and energy loss) and the presence of nuclei in the interstellar matter. We consider a two-zone diffusion model, with and without a Galactic wind. We find that, given the uncertainties in the background predictions, there is no need for a primary (exotic) component to explain current data. However, allowing for a signal by playing with the uncertainties in the background estimate, we discuss the characteristic features of the supersymmetric models that give a satisfactory description of the data. We point out that in some cases, the optimal kinetic energy to search for a signal from supersymmetric dark matter is above several GeV, rather than the traditional sub-GeV region. The large astrophysical uncertainties involved do not, on the other hand, allow the exclusion of any of the MSSM models we consider on the basis of data. In addition to numerical results, we also present convenient parameterizations of the antiproton yields of all "basic" two-body final states. We also give examples of the yield and differential energy spectrum for a set of supersymmetric models with high rates. We also remark that it is difficult to set a limit on the antiproton lifetime from present measurements, since the injection of antiprotons from neutralino annihilation can compensate for the loss from decay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544
Big-bang nucleosynthesis enters the precision era
Schramm, D. N., & Turner, M. S. (1998) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.303 · Cited by 353 · cited 1×
“Present observations favor h = 0.6± 0.1, and a total matter density ΩM = 0.3± 0.1, of which baryons may contribute 0.02 to 0.08 (see, e.g., Schramm & Turner 1998).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Dark matter and collider phenomenology of universal extra dimensions
Hooper, D., & Profumo, S. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.09.003 · Cited by 358
Cosmic ray nuclei, antiprotons and gamma rays in the galaxy: a new diffusion model
Evoli, C., Gaggero, D., Grasso, D., & Maccione, L. (2008) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/018 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergstrom, L., Edsjo, J., & Ullio, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1999-11-20
- Volume
- 526
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 215-235
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1976492641
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmic Antiprotons as a Probe for Supersymmetric Dark Matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/307975
- The paper
- Bergstrom, L., Edsjo, J., & Ullio, P. (1999). Cosmic Antiprotons as a Probe for Supersymmetric Dark Matter? The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/307975
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.