The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diffuse Continuum Gamma Rays from the Galaxy
Open accessAbstract
A new study of the diffuse Galactic γ-ray continuum radiation is presented, using a cosmic-ray propagation model which includes nucleons, antiprotons, electrons, positrons, and synchrotron radiation. Our treatment of the inverse Compton scattering includes the effect of anisotropic scattering in the Galactic interstellar radiation field (ISRF) and a new evaluation of the ISRF itself. Models based on locally measured electron and nucleon spectra and synchrotron constraints are consistent with γ-ray measurements in the 30-500 MeV range, but outside this range excesses are apparent. A harder nucleon spectrum is considered but fitting to γ-rays causes it to violate limits from positrons and antiprotons. A harder interstellar electron spectrum allows the γ-ray spectrum to be fitted above 1 GeV as well, and this can be further improved when combined with a modified nucleon spectrum which still respects the limits imposed by antiprotons and positrons. A large electron/inverse Compton halo is proposed which reproduces well the high-latitude variation of γ-ray emission; this is taken as support for the halo size for nucleons deduced from studies of cosmic-ray composition. Halo sizes in the range 4-10 kpc are favored by both analyses. The halo contribution of Galactic emission to the high-latitude γ-ray intensity is large, with implications for the study of the diffuse extragalactic component and signatures of dark matter. The constraints provided by the radio synchrotron spectral index do not allow all of the γ-ray emission at less than 30 MeV to be explained in terms of a steep electron spectrum unless this takes the form of a sharp upturn below 200 MeV. This leads us to prefer a source population as the origin of the excess low-energy γ-rays, which can then be seen as a continuation of the hard X-ray continuum measured by OSSE, Ginga , and RXTE .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
THE LARGE AREA TELESCOPE ON THE FERMI GAMMA-RAY SPACE TELESCOPE MISSION
Atwood, W. B., Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Althouse, W., Anderson, B., Axelsson, M., Baldini, L., Ballet, J., Band, D. L., Barbiellini, G., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1071 · Cited by 4,198
Self-citationAstrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory
Brandenburg, A., & Subramanian, K. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.06.005 · Cited by 1,640
Kelner, S. R., Aharonian, F. A., & Bugayov, V. V. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.034018 · Cited by 916
THE SPECTRUM AND MORPHOLOGY OF THE FERMI BUBBLES
Ackermann, M., Albert, A., Atwood, W. B., Baldini, L., Ballet, J., Barbiellini, G., Bastieri, D., Bellazzini, R., Bissaldi, E., Blandford, R. D., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/793/1/64 · Cited by 328
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., & Reimer, O.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-07-10
- Volume
- 537
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 763-784
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2022838036
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffuse Continuum Gamma Rays from the Galaxy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/309038
- The paper
- Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., & Reimer, O. (2000). Diffuse Continuum Gamma Rays from the Galaxy. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/309038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.