The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Albedo and Reflection Spectra of Extrasolar Giant Planets
Open accessAbstract
We generate theoretical albedo and reflection spectra for a full range of extrasolar giant planet (EGP) models, from Jovian to 51 Pegasi class objects. Our albedo modeling utilizes the latest atomic and molecular cross sections, Mie theory treatment of scattering and absorption by condensates, a variety of particle size distributions, and an extension of the Feautrier technique, which allows for a general treatment of the scattering phase function. We find that, because of qualitative similarities in the compositions and spectra of objects within each of five broad effective temperature ranges, it is natural to establish five representative EGP albedo classes. At low effective temperatures ( T eff ≲ 150 K) is a class of "Jovian" objects (class I) with tropospheric ammonia clouds. Somewhat warmer class II, or "water cloud," EGPs are primarily affected by condensed H 2 O. Gaseous methane absorption features are prevalent in both classes. In the absence of nonequilibrium condensates in the upper atmosphere, and with sufficient H 2 O condensation, class II objects are expected to have the highest visible albedos of any class. When the upper atmosphere of an EGP is too hot for H 2 O to condense, radiation generally penetrates more deeply. In these objects, designated class III or "clear" because of a lack of condensation in the upper atmosphere, absorption lines of the alkali metals, sodium and potassium, lower the albedo significantly throughout the visible. Furthermore, the near-infrared albedo is negligible, primarily because of strong CH 4 and H 2 O molecular absorption and collision-induced absorption (CIA) by H 2 molecules. In those EGPs with exceedingly small orbital distance ("roasters") and 900 K ≲ T eff ≲ 1500 K (class IV), a tropospheric silicate layer is expected to exist. In all but the hottest ( T eff ≳ 1500 K) or lowest gravity roasters, the effect of this silicate layer is likely to be insignificant because of the very strong absorption by sodium and potassium atoms above the layer. The resonance lines of sodium and potassium are expected to be salient features in the reflection spectra of these EGPs. In the absence of nonequilibrium condensates, we find, in contrast to previous studies, that these class IV roasters likely have the lowest visible and Bond albedos of any class, rivaling the lowest albedos of our solar system. For the small fraction of roasters with T eff ≳ 1500 K and/or low surface gravity (≲10 3 cm s -2 ; class V), the silicate layer is located very high in the atmosphere, reflecting much of the incident radiation before it can reach the absorbing alkali metals and molecular species. Hence, the class V roasters have much higher albedos than those of class IV. In addition, for class V objects, UV irradiation may result in significant alkali metal ionization, thereby further weakening the alkali metal absorption lines. We derive Bond albedos ( A B ) and T eff estimates for the full set of known EGPs. A broad range in both values is found, with T eff ranging from ~150 to nearly 1600 K, and A B from ~0.02 to 0.8. We find that variations in particle size distributions and condensation fraction can have large quantitative, or even qualitative, effects on albedo spectra. In general, less condensation, larger particle sizes, and wider size distributions result in lower albedos. We explore the effects of nonequilibrium condensed products of photolysis above or within principal cloud decks. As in Jupiter, such species can lower the UV/blue albedo substantially, even if present in relatively small mixing ratios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star
Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378355a0 · Cited by 4,111
Detection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312457 · Cited by 1,415
Cited by
Detection of an Extrasolar Planet Atmosphere
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Noyes, R. W., & Gilliland, R. L. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/338770 · Cited by 1,346
The theory of brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets
Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., & Liebert, J. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.719 · Cited by 819
Self-citationOn the Tidal Inflation of Short‐Period Extrasolar Planets
Bodenheimer, P., Lin, D. N. C., & Mardling, R. A. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/318667 · Cited by 415
Photometric Light Curves and Polarization of Close‐in Extrasolar Giant Planets
Seager, S., Whitney, B. A., & Sasselov, D. D. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309292 · Cited by 331
CAN TiO EXPLAIN THERMAL INVERSIONS IN THE UPPER ATMOSPHERES OF IRRADIATED GIANT PLANETS?
Spiegel, D. S., Silverio, K., & Burrows, A. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/1487 · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sudarsky, D., Burrows, A., & Pinto, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 538
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 885-903
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2109021933
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Albedo and Reflection Spectra of Extrasolar Giant Planets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/309160
- The paper
- Sudarsky, D., Burrows, A., & Pinto, P. (2000). Albedo and Reflection Spectra of Extrasolar Giant Planets. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/309160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.