Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 433

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self‐similar Accretion Flows with Convection

Open access
Narayan, Ramesh, Igumenshchev, Igor V., Abramowicz, Marek A.·2000·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We consider height-integrated equations of an advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF), assuming that there is no mass outflow. We include convection through a mixing-length formalism. We seek self-similar solutions in which the rotational velocity and sound speed scale as R -1/2 , where R is the radius, and consider two limiting prescriptions for the transport of angular momentum by convection. In one limit, the transport occurs down the angular velocity gradient, so convection moves angular momentum outward. In the other, the transport is down the specific angular momentum gradient, so convection moves angular momentum inward. We also consider general prescriptions that lie in between the two limits. When convection moves angular momentum outward, we recover the usual self-similar solution for ADAFs in which the mass density scales as ρ ∝ R -3/2 . When convection moves angular momentum inward, the result depends on the viscosity coefficient α. If α > α crit1 ~ 0.05, we once again find the standard ADAF solution. For α < α crit2 ~ α crit1 , however, we find a nonaccreting solution in which ρ ∝ R -1/2 . We refer to this as a "convective envelope" solution or a "convection-dominated accretion flow." Two-dimensional numerical simulations of ADAFs with values of α ≲ 0.03 have been reported by several authors. The simulated ADAFs exhibit convection. By virtue of their axisymmetry, convection in these simulations moves angular momentum inward, as we confirm by computing the Reynolds stress. The simulations give ρ ∝ R -1/2 , in good agreement with the convective envelope solution. The R -1/2 density profile is not a consequence of mass outflow. The relevance of these axisymmetric low-α simulations to real accretion flows is uncertain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/309268

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 433

Metadata

Authors
Narayan, R., Igumenshchev, I. V., & Abramowicz, M. A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2000-08-20
Volume
539
Issue
2
Pages
798-808
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2078610677
Cited by
433
References
1
FWCI
27.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self‐similar Accretion Flows with Convection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/309268
The paper
Narayan, R., Igumenshchev, I. V., & Abramowicz, M. A. (2000). Self‐similar Accretion Flows with Convection. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/309268

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.