The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self‐similar Accretion Flows with Convection
Open accessAbstract
We consider height-integrated equations of an advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF), assuming that there is no mass outflow. We include convection through a mixing-length formalism. We seek self-similar solutions in which the rotational velocity and sound speed scale as R -1/2 , where R is the radius, and consider two limiting prescriptions for the transport of angular momentum by convection. In one limit, the transport occurs down the angular velocity gradient, so convection moves angular momentum outward. In the other, the transport is down the specific angular momentum gradient, so convection moves angular momentum inward. We also consider general prescriptions that lie in between the two limits. When convection moves angular momentum outward, we recover the usual self-similar solution for ADAFs in which the mass density scales as ρ ∝ R -3/2 . When convection moves angular momentum inward, the result depends on the viscosity coefficient α. If α > α crit1 ~ 0.05, we once again find the standard ADAF solution. For α < α crit2 ~ α crit1 , however, we find a nonaccreting solution in which ρ ∝ R -1/2 . We refer to this as a "convective envelope" solution or a "convection-dominated accretion flow." Two-dimensional numerical simulations of ADAFs with values of α ≲ 0.03 have been reported by several authors. The simulated ADAFs exhibit convection. By virtue of their axisymmetry, convection in these simulations moves angular momentum inward, as we confirm by computing the Reynolds stress. The simulations give ρ ∝ R -1/2 , in good agreement with the convective envelope solution. The R -1/2 density profile is not a consequence of mass outflow. The relevance of these axisymmetric low-α simulations to real accretion flows is uncertain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advection-dominated Accretion: Underfed Black Holes and Neutron Stars
Narayan, R., & Yi, I. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176343 · Cited by 1,679
Self-citation
Cited by
Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes
Yuan, F., & Narayan, R. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003 · Cited by 1,529
Self-citationFoundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory
Abramowicz, M. A., & Fragile, P. C. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-1 · Cited by 668
Self-citationNarayan, R., Sądowski, A., Penna, R. F., & Kulkarni, A. K. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22002.x · Cited by 503
Self-citationMagnetohydrodynamic Production of Relativistic Jets
Meier, D. L., Koide, S., & Uchida, Y. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5501.84 · Cited by 406
Stellar processes near the massive black hole in the Galactic center
Alexander, T. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.002 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Narayan, R., Igumenshchev, I. V., & Abramowicz, M. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-08-20
- Volume
- 539
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 798-808
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2078610677
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self‐similar Accretion Flows with Convection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/309268
- The paper
- Narayan, R., Igumenshchev, I. V., & Abramowicz, M. A. (2000). Self‐similar Accretion Flows with Convection. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/309268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.