The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Giant Planets at Small Orbital Distances
Open accessAbstract
Using Doppler spectroscopy to detect the reflex motion of the nearby star, 51 Pegasi, Mayor & Queloz (1995) claim to have discovered a giant planet in a 0.05 AU, 4.23 day orbit. They estimate its mass to be in the range 0.5-2 Jupiter masses, but are not able to determine its nature or origin. Including the effects of the severe stellar insolation implied, we extend the theory of giant planets we have recently developed to encompass those at very small orbital distances. Our calculations can be used to help formulate search strategies for luminous planets in tight orbits around other nearby stars. We calculate the radii and luminosities of such giant planets for a variety of compositions (H/He, He, H 2 O, and olivine), the evolutionary tracks for solar-composition gas giants, and the geometry of the Hayashi forbidden zone in the gas-giant mass regime. We show that such planets are stable and estimate the magnitude of classical Jeans evaporation and of photodissociation and loss due to EUV radiation. In addition, we demonstrate that for the mass range quoted, such planets are well within their Roche lobes. We show that the strong composition dependence of the model radii and the distinctive spectral signatures provide clear diagnostics that might reveal 51 Peg B's nature, should interferometric or adaptive-optics techniques ever succeed in photometrically separating planet from star.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star
Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378355a0 · Cited by 4,111
Cited by
Detection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312457 · Cited by 1,415
A Transiting “51 Peg–like” Planet
Henry, G. W., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., & Vogt, S. S. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312458 · Cited by 964
Evolutionary models for cool brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets. The case of HD 209458
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Barman, T., Allard, F. C., & Hauschildt, P. H. (2003) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030252/pdf · Cited by 916
The theory of brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets
Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., & Liebert, J. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.719 · Cited by 819
Atmospheric Loss of Exoplanets Resulting from Stellar X-Ray and Extreme-Ultraviolet Heating
Lammer, H., Selsis, F., Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., Bauer, S. J., & Weiss, W. W. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/380815 · Cited by 636
Metadata
- Authors
- Guillot, Burrows, Hubbard, Lunine, & Saumon, D.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1996-03-01
- Volume
- 459
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010545881
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Giant Planets at Small Orbital Distances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/309935
- The paper
- Guillot, Burrows, Hubbard, Lunine, & Saumon, D. (1996). Giant Planets at Small Orbital Distances. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/309935
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.