The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of Strong Magnetic Fields on M Dwarfs
Open accessAbstract
We have detected Zeeman splitting of the Fe I line ( g eff = 2.5) at 8468.40 Å in the very active M4.5 Ve stars Gliese 729 and Gliese 873 (EV Lac). High-resolution ( R = 120,000), low-noise (~0.5%) spectra show clear Zeeman-shifted σ components from which we infer field strengths of 2-4 kG, independent of uncertainties in model atmospheres. Similar observations of a sequence (M0 V-M5 V) of low-activity M dwarfs demonstrate that the wing components in the 8468.40 Å line are not due to the ubiquitous TiO lines in the vicinity. This strongly suggests that discrepancies in the shape of the magnetically sensitive iron line are due to magnetic fields rather than differences in photospheric temperature. By fitting the ratio of active to inactive line profiles with simple one-component models, we estimate that 50 ± 13% of the photosphere of EV Lac is covered by 3.8 ± 0.5 kG magnetic fields, while 50 ± 13% of Gliese 729 is covered by 2.6 ± 0.3 kG fields. This confirms earlier reports of large magnetic fields on M dwarf flare stars. We see evidence for a distribution of magnetic field strength, spatially across the surface and/or with depth. The twofold increase in field strength relative to G and K dwarfs is predicted by flux tube equilibrium arguments, but the 1 kG difference in the measured field strengths for these two stars suggests that field strengths may also grow with activity as the photospheric filling factor approaches unity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Reappraisal of The Habitability of Planets around M Dwarf Stars
Tarter, J. C., Backus, P. R., Mancinelli, R. L., Aurnou, J. M., Backman, D. E., Basri, G. S., Boss, A. P., Clarke, A., Deming, D., Doyle, L. R., et al. (2007) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2006.0124 · Cited by 340
West, A. A., Hawley, S. L., Walkowicz, L. M., Covey, K. R., Silvestri, N. M., Raymond, S. N., Harris, H. C., Munn, J. A., McGehee, P. M., Ivezić, Ž., et al. (2004) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/421364 · Cited by 335
The stellar rotation–activity relationship in fully convective M dwarfs
Wright, N. J., Newton, E. R., Williams, P. K. G., Drake, J. J., & Yadav, R. K. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1670 · Cited by 284
THE ROTATION AND GALACTIC KINEMATICS OF MID M DWARFS IN THE SOLAR NEIGHBORHOOD
Newton, E. R., Irwin, J., Charbonneau, D., Berta-Thompson, Z. K., Dittmann, J. A., & West, A. A. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/2/93 · Cited by 279
Measuring the Magnetic Field on the Classical T Tauri Star BP Tauri
Johns‐Krull, C. M., Valenti, J. A., & Koresko, C. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307128 · Cited by 274
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Johns-Krull, C. M., & Valenti, J. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1996-03-10
- Volume
- 459
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989885283
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Strong Magnetic Fields on M Dwarfs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/309954
- The paper
- Johns-Krull, C. M., & Valenti, J. A. (1996). Detection of Strong Magnetic Fields on M Dwarfs. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/309954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.