The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrodynamics of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow
Open accessAbstract
The detection of delayed emission at X-ray optical and radio wavelengths ("afterglow") following gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) suggests that the relativistic shell that emitted the initial GRB as the result of internal shocks decelerates on encountering an external medium, giving rise to the afterglow. We explore the interaction of a relativistic shell with a uniform interstellar medium (ISM) up to the nonrelativistic stage. We demonstrate the importance of several effects that were previously ignored and must be included in a detailed radiation analysis. At a very early stage (few seconds), the observed bolometric luminosity increases as t 2 . On longer timescales (more than ~10 s), the luminosity drops as t −1 . If the main burst is long enough, an intermediate stage of constant luminosity will form. In this case, the afterglow overlaps the main burst; otherwise there is a time separation between the two. On the long timescale, the flow decelerates in a self-similar way, reaching nonrelativistic velocities after ~30 days. Explicit expressions for the radial profiles of this self-similar deceleration are given. As a result of the deceleration and the accumulation of ISM material, the relation between the observed time, the shock radius, and its Lorentz factor is given by t = R /16γ 2 c , which is a factor of 8 different from the usual expression. We show that even though only a small fraction of the internal energy is given to the electrons, most of the energy can be radiated over time. If the fraction of energy in electrons is greater than ~10%, radiation losses will significantly influence the hydrodynamical evolution at early times (less than ~1 day).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves
Blandford, R. D., & McKee, C. F. (1976) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.861619 · Cited by 1,215
Cited by
Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows
Sari, R., Piran, T., & Narayan, R. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/311269 · Cited by 2,297
Self-citationGamma-ray bursts and the fireball model
Piran, T. (1999) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(98)00127-6 · Cited by 1,498
The Dynamics and Light Curves of Beamed Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows
Rhoads, J. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307907 · Cited by 787
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
GRB 990123: The Optical Flash and the Fireball Model
Sari, R., & Piran, T. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312039 · Cited by 356
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sari, R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1997-11-01
- Volume
- 489
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L37-L40
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058511789
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrodynamics of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/310957
- The paper
- Sari, R. (1997). Hydrodynamics of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/310957
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.