The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Deep Submillimeter Survey of Lensing Clusters: A New Window on Galaxy Formation and Evolution
Open accessAbstract
We present the first results of a submillimeter survey of distant clusters using the new Submillimeter Common-User Bolometer Array (SCUBA) on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. We have mapped fields in two massive, concentrated clusters, A370 at z =0.37 and Cl 2244-02 at z =0.33, at wavelengths of 450 and 850 μm. The resulting continuum maps cover a total area of about 10 arcmin 2 to 1 σ noise levels less than 14 and 2 mJy beam -1 at the two wavelengths, 2-3 orders of magnitude deeper than was previously possible. We have concentrated on lensing clusters to exploit the amplification of all background sources by the cluster, improving the sensitivity by a factor of 1.3-2 as compared with a blank-field survey. A cumulative source surface density of (2.4±1.0) × 10 3 deg -2 is found to a 50% completeness limit of ~4 mJy at 850 μm. The submillimeter spectral properties of these sources indicate that the majority lie at high redshift, z >1. Without correcting for lens amplification, our observations limit the blank-field counts at this depth. The surface density is 3 orders of magnitude greater than the expectation of a nonevolving model using the local IRAS 60 μm luminosity function. The observed source counts thus require a substantial increase in the number density of strongly star-forming galaxies in the high-redshift universe and suggest that optical surveys may have substantially underestimated the star formation density in the distant universe. Deeper submillimeter surveys with SCUBA should detect large numbers of star-forming galaxies at high redshift and so provide strong constraints on the formation of normal galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Redshift Survey of the Submillimeter Galaxy Population
Chapman, S. C., Blain, A. W., Smail, I., & Ivison, R. J. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428082 · Cited by 1,163
Self-citationPérez‐González, P. G., Rieke, G. H., Villar, V., Barro, G., Blaylock, M., Egami, E., Gallego, J., Gil de Paz, A., Pascual, S., Zamorano, J., et al. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/523690 · Cited by 601
Reddy, N. A., & Steidel, C. C. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/1/778 · Cited by 555
Probing the Universe with Weak Lensing
Mellier, Y. (1999) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.127 · Cited by 490
Aravena, M., Decarli, R., Walter, F., Cunha, E. D., Bauer, F. E., Carilli, C. L., Daddi, E., Elbaz, D., Ivison, R. J., Riechers, D. A., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/68 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., & Blain, A. W.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1997-11-20
- Volume
- 490
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L5-L8
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017100570
- Cited by
- 1,180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Deep Submillimeter Survey of Lensing Clusters: A New Window on Galaxy Formation and Evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/311017
- The paper
- Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., & Blain, A. W. (1997). A Deep Submillimeter Survey of Lensing Clusters: A New Window on Galaxy Formation and Evolution. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/311017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.