Cited by 180Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

Detection of Polarized Millimeter and Submillimeter Emission from Sagittarius A*

Open access
Aitken, D. K., Greaves, J., Chrysostomou, Antonio, Jenness, T., Holland, W., Hough, J. H., Pierce-Price, D., Richer, J.·2000·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We report the detection of linear polarization from Sgr A* at 750, 850, 1350, and 2000 µm which confirms the contribution of synchrotron radiation. From the lack of polarization at longer wavelengths, it appears to arise in the millimeter/submillimeter excess. There are large position angle changes between the millimeter and submillimeter results, and these are discussed in terms of a polarized dust contribution in the submillimeter and various synchrotron models. In the model that best explains the data, the synchrotron radiation from the excess is self-absorbed in the millimeter region and becomes optically thin in the submillimeter. This implies that the excess arises in an extremely compact source of approximately 2 Schwarzschild radii.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/312685

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observations of polarization and its variability in mm, sub-mm, and near IR wavelengths within the central 0.1 pc of Sgr A* have been instrumental in determining the mass accretion rate of the SMBH.

    “Observations of polarization and its variability in mm, sub-mm, and near IR wavelengths within the central 0 . 1 pc of the Sgr A ∗ have been instrumental in determining the mass accretion rate of the SMBH (Aitken et al. 2000; Marrone et al. 2007; Eckart et al. 2012; Brinkerink et al. 2016; Bower et al. 2018; Do et al. 2019; Michail et al. 2023).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Aitken et al. 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aitken, D. K., Greaves, J., Chrysostomou, A., Jenness, T., Holland, W., Hough, J. H., Pierce-Price, D., & Richer, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • University of Hawaii at Hilo (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2000-05-10
Volume
534
Issue
2
Pages
L173-L176
ISSN
0004-637X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086403458
Cited by
180
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Centre for Supercomputing Applications
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Keywords
Sgr A*, linear polarization, millimeter-wave emission, submillimeter emission, synchrotron radiation, self-absorption, compact radio sources, Galactic Center

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review