Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Exactly Did the Universe Become Neutral?

Open access
Seager, Sara, Sasselov, Dimitar D., Scott, Douglas·2000·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We present a refined treatment of H, He I, and He II recombination in the early universe. The difference from previous calculations is that we use multilevel atoms and evolve the population of each level with redshift by including all bound-bound and bound-free transitions. In this framework we follow several hundred atomic energy levels for H, He I, and He II combined. The main improvements of this method over previous recombination calculations are (1) allowing excited atomic level populations to depart from an equilibrium distribution, (2) replacing the total recombination coefficient with recombination to and photoionization from each level calculated directly at each redshift step, and (3) correct treatment of the He I atom, including the triplet and singlet states. We find that x e (≡ n e / n H ) is approximately 10% smaller at redshifts ≲800 than in previous calculations, as a result of the nonequilibrium of the excited states of H that is caused by the strong but cool radiation field at those redshifts. In addition, we find that He I recombination is delayed compared with previous calculations and occurs only just before H recombination. These changes in turn can affect the predicted power spectrum of microwave anisotropies at the few percent level. Other improvements, such as including molecular and ionic species of H, including complete heating and cooling terms for the evolution of the matter temperature, including collisional rates, and including feedback of the secondary spectral distortions on the radiation field, produce negligible change to the ionization fraction. The lower x e at low z found in this work affects the abundances of H molecular and ionic species by 10%-25%. However, this difference is probably not larger than other uncertainties in the reaction rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/313388

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Seager, S., Sasselov, D. D., & Scott, D.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2000-06
Volume
128
Issue
2
Pages
407-430
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2132424157
Cited by
424
References
2
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Exactly Did the Universe Become Neutral? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/313388
The paper
Seager, S., Sasselov, D. D., & Scott, D. (2000). How Exactly Did the Universe Become Neutral? The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/313388

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.