The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inadequate Antimicrobial Treatment: An Important Determinant of Outcome for Hospitalized Patients
Open accessAbstract
Inadequate antimicrobial treatment, generally defined as microbiological documentation of an infection that is not being effectively treated, is an important factor in the emergence of infections due to antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Factors that contribute to inadequate antimicrobial treatment of hospitalized patients include prior antibiotic exposure, use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, prolonged length of stay, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and presence of invasive devices. Strategies to minimize inadequate treatment include consulting an infectious disease specialist, using antibiotic practice guidelines, and identifying quicker methods of microbiological identification. In addition, clinicians should determine the prevailing pathogens that account for the community-acquired and nosocomial infections identified in their hospitals. Clinicians can improve antimicrobial treatment by using empirical combination antibiotic therapy based on individual patient characteristics and the predominant bacterial flora and their antibiotic susceptibility profiles. This broad-spectrum therapy can then be narrowed when initial culture results are received. Further study evaluating the use of antibiotic practice guidelines and strategies to reduce inadequate treatment is necessary to determine their impact on patient outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inadequate Antimicrobial Treatment of Infections
Kollef, M. H., Sherman, G., Ward, S., & Fraser, V. J. (1999) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.115.2.462 · Cited by 1,805
Self-citationIncidence of anaerobes in ventilator-associated pneumonia with use of a protected specimen brush.
Doré, P., Robert, R., Grollier, G., Rouffineau, J., Lanquetot, H., Charrière, J. M., & Fauchère, J. L. (1996) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.153.4.8616556 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Freifeld, A. G., Bow, E. J., Sepkowitz, K. A., Boeckh, M. J., Ito, J. I., Mullen, C. A., Raad, I. I., Rolston, K. V., Young, J.-A. H., & Wingard, J. R. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir073 · Cited by 3,463
Morrell, M., Fraser, V. J., & Kollef, M. H. (2005) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.49.9.3640-3645.2005 · Cited by 1,286
Self-citationCombination Therapy for Treatment of Infections with Gram-Negative Bacteria
Tamma, P. D., Cosgrove, S. E., & Maragakis, L. L. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.05041-11 · Cited by 836
Blot, S. I., Depuydt, P., Annemans, L., Benoit, D., Hoste, E., De Waele, J. J., Decruyenaere, J., Vogelaers, D., Colardyn, F., & Vandewoude, K. H. (2005) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/497833 · Cited by 409
Kett, D. H., Cano, E., Quartin, A. A., Mangino, J. E., Zervos, M. J., Peyrani, P., Cely, C. M., Ford, K. D., Scerpella, E. G., & Ramirez, J. A. (2011) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70314-5 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Kollef, M. H.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- Supplement_4
- Pages
- S131-S138
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2011920054
- Cited by
- 635
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inadequate Antimicrobial Treatment: An Important Determinant of Outcome for Hospitalized Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/314079
- The paper
- Kollef, M. H. (2000). Inadequate Antimicrobial Treatment: An Important Determinant of Outcome for Hospitalized Patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/314079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.