The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Canada-UK Deep Submillimeter Survey. IV. The Survey of the 14 Hour Field
Open accessAbstract
We have used SCUBA to survey an area of ≃ 50 arcmin 2 , detecting 19 sources down to a 3 σ sensitivity limit of ∼3.5 mJy at 850 μm. Monte Carlo simulations have shown that the fluxes of sources in this and similar SCUBA surveys are biased upward by the effects of source confusion and noise, leading to an overestimate by a factor of ∼1.4 in the fraction of the 850 μm background that has been resolved by SCUBA. Once a correction is made for this effect, about 20% of the background has been resolved. The simulations have also been used to quantify the effects of confusion on source positions. Of the 19 SCUBA sources, five are microjansky radio sources, and two are ISO 15 μm sources. The radio/submillmeter flux ratios imply that the dust in these galaxies is being heated by young stars rather than active galactic nuclei. The upper limit to the average 450 μm/850 μm flux ratio implies either that the SCUBA galaxies are at z 2 or, if they are at lower redshifts, that the dust is generally colder than in ULIRGs. We have used simple evolution models to address the major questions about the SCUBA sources: (1) What fraction of the star formation at high redshift is hidden by dust? (2) Does the submillimeter luminosity density reach a maximum at some redshift? (3) If the SCUBA sources are protoellipticals, when exactly did ellipticals form? We show, however, that the observations are not yet good enough to answer these questions. There are, for example, acceptable models in which 10 times as much high-redshift star formation is hidden by dust as is seen at optical wavelengths, but also acceptable ones in which the amount of hidden star formation is less than that seen optically. There are acceptable models in which very little star formation occurred before a redshift of 3 (as might be expected in models of hierarchical galaxy formation), but also ones in which 30% of the stars have formed by this redshift. The key to answering these questions are measurements of the dust temperatures and redshifts of the SCUBA sources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Redshift Survey of the Submillimeter Galaxy Population
Chapman, S. C., Blain, A. W., Smail, I., & Ivison, R. J. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428082 · Cited by 1,163
Chary, R., & Elbaz, D. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/321609 · Cited by 1,073
The Dust Opacity of Star‐forming Galaxies
Calzetti, D. (2001) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/324269 · Cited by 829
Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
High‐Resolution Millimeter Imaging of Submillimeter Galaxies
Tacconi, L. J., Neri, R., Chapman, S. C., Genzel, R., Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., Bertoldi, F., Blain, A., Cox, P., Greve, T., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/499933 · Cited by 526
Metadata
- Authors
- Eales, S., Lilly, S., Webb, T., Dunne, L., Gear, W., Clements, D., & Yun, M.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2244-2268
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084061910
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Canada-UK Deep Submillimeter Survey. IV. The Survey of the 14 Hour Field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/316823
- The paper
- Eales, S., Lilly, S., Webb, T., Dunne, L., Gear, W., Clements, D., & Yun, M. (2000). The Canada-UK Deep Submillimeter Survey. IV. The Survey of the 14 Hour Field. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/316823
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.